Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Rizky Ahadyan Ardyansyah
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Penghapusan Presidential Threshold dalam Perspektif Imam al-Mawardi (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 62/PUU-XXII/2024) Rizky Ahadyan Ardyansyah
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Tema Hukum Islam
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i2.2298

Abstract

The abolition of the Presidential Threshold through Constitutional Court Decision No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024 has sparked debate over political justice and governmental stability. This study analyzes the issue through Imam Al-Mawardi’s perspective on state politics, focusing on leadership, political legitimacy, and the principle of public interest (maslahah). Using a normative legal method with conceptual and case approaches, the findings reveal that removing the threshold risks producing leaders with weak legitimacy, while maintaining an excessively high threshold creates political injustice. The ideal position is to establish a proportional threshold aligned with maslahah and substantive justice.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pasal 217 dan 240 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang KUHP Ahmad Fatih Karomi; Rizky Ahadyan Ardyansyah
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): November,2025
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v6i2.16414

Abstract

This research examines the implementation of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Indone- sian Penal Code, specifically Articles 217 and 240, which effectively restrict citizens' rights to express their opinions. Cases such as those involving Ahmad Dhani and Haris Azhar-Fatia highlight how legal provisions intended for protection are instead used to silence dissenting voices. The Constitutional Court had previ- ously clarified in Decision No. 013-022/PUU-IV/2006 that these restrictions on freedom of expression are inconsistent with the constitution. However, the reality on the ground shows that this ruling is not being enforced. This study employs a qualitative approach to thoroughly analyze legal provisions related to defamation of the President and state institutions. The analysis reveals that Articles 217 and 240 of the Penal Code conflicts with human rights principles, particularly freedom of expression. The broad interpretation of these articles poses a significant threat to democracy. The urgency to revise these articles in alignment with democratic values is increasingly evident.
Co-Authors Ahmad Fatih Karomi