Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
Ega Pangalingan
UNM
Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
HAKIKAT KEBENARAN ILMIAH DALAM TRADISI FILSAFAT BARAT DAN ISLAM: STUDI LITERATURE REVIEW KONSEP ONTOLOGI EPISTEMOLOGI Ega Pangalingan; Andi Ridwan; Ardiansyah Setiawan; Muh. Dzakwan Mangawiang; Fadli; Zulkifli
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 10 No. 04 (2025): Volume 10 No. 04 Desember 2025 In Published
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v10i04.37193

Abstract

This study examines the nature of scientific truth in Western and Islamic philosophical traditions through a comparative analysis of ontological and epistemological concepts. The problem stems from the gap in understanding the philosophical foundations of scientific truth that differ diametrically between the two traditions, where the West has separated the domains of religion and science since the Renaissance era, while Islam maintains a holistic view that integrates revelation, reason, and experience. The research method employs a qualitative approach with systematic literature study analyzing relevant primary and secondary sources from classical to contemporary periods. The research findings indicate that ontologically, the West constructs reality based on secular materialism while Islam is based on the holistic principle of tawhid. Epistemologically, the West relies on rationalism and empiricism, whereas Islam positions revelation as the primary source complemented by reason. Despite fundamental differences, both traditions share the same commitment to the pursuit of truth. This research contributes to the development of comparative epistemology and offers a methodological framework for cross-traditional researchers in designing research sensitive to differences in philosophical assumptions.
Co-Authors Andi Ridwan Ardiansyah Setiawan Fadli Muh. Dzakwan Mangawiang Zulkifli