This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akuntansi
Setiabudi, Andang Wirawan
Program Studi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

RASIO PAJAK OPTIMAL DAN TINGKAT PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DI INDONESIATAHUN 1970-2008 Setiabudi, Andang Wirawan
Jurnal Akuntansi Vol 10 No 2 (2017): Jurnal Akuntansi
Publisher : Program Studi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (608.947 KB) | DOI: 10.25170/jara.v10i2.44

Abstract

Many economists have stated that the government through its either fiscal policies or monetary policies has an important role in supporting economic growth of a country. As the consequence of government’s role in the development process, the size of the government – measured as the ratio of total spending to GDP also expanded along with the economic development. This is the fact faced by any country in the world. However, the growth of government’s size implies higher taxation, and thus, it sometimes become a bad sign for the whole economy. The higher tax collected by the government the more productive source taken by the government from the private sector. If positive impacts of government spending cannot exceed negative impact caused by the lost of productive source of private sectors deadweight loss of economy will appear. By assuming that government runs balanced budget in which all of the government expenditure is financed by tax revenue, so the growth maximizing tax ratio can be estimated. This rate measures the ratio of tax revenue to GDP that is needed to achieve the high and stable growth rate.        The main objective of this study are to find the growth maximizing tax ratio for Indonesia and to analyze whether Indonesia has achieved this optimum point, or has been operating below it or contrary above it. The regression result show that the growth maximizing tax ratio for Indonesia is 14,64%.
RASIO PAJAK OPTIMAL DAN TINGKAT PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DI INDONESIATAHUN 1970-2008 Setiabudi, Andang Wirawan
Jurnal Akuntansi Vol 10 No 2 (2017): Jurnal Akuntansi
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (608.947 KB) | DOI: 10.25170/jara.v10i2.44

Abstract

Many economists have stated that the government through its either fiscal policies or monetary policies has an important role in supporting economic growth of a country. As the consequence of government’s role in the development process, the size of the government – measured as the ratio of total spending to GDP also expanded along with the economic development. This is the fact faced by any country in the world. However, the growth of government’s size implies higher taxation, and thus, it sometimes become a bad sign for the whole economy. The higher tax collected by the government the more productive source taken by the government from the private sector. If positive impacts of government spending cannot exceed negative impact caused by the lost of productive source of private sectors deadweight loss of economy will appear. By assuming that government runs balanced budget in which all of the government expenditure is financed by tax revenue, so the growth maximizing tax ratio can be estimated. This rate measures the ratio of tax revenue to GDP that is needed to achieve the high and stable growth rate.   The main objective of this study are to find the growth maximizing tax ratio for Indonesia and to analyze whether Indonesia has achieved this optimum point, or has been operating below it or contrary above it. The regression result show that the growth maximizing tax ratio for Indonesia is 14,64%.
ANALISIS PEMENUHAN KONSEP CURRENT PAYMENT DAN FINAL LIABILITY DALAM PENGHITUNGAN PPH PASAL 25 DAN PENGENAAN SANKSI TERKAIT Setiabudi, Andang Wirawan
Jurnal Akuntansi Vol 13 No 1 (2019): Jurnal Akuntansi
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (419.209 KB) | DOI: 10.25170/jara.v13i1.489

Abstract

Nowadays about 80% of APBN (National Budget) revenue is rooted from tax revenue.  Therefore, Directorate General of Tax Department (Dirjen Pajak/DJP) as the organizer of tax revenue should straighten themselves up constantly in order that they could reach the revenue target which is burdened. One of the actions is through tax reform system which relies on self-assessment system.  People, in this system, are the most in determining of the activity that they should do by themselves connected to the tax; starting from the registration of tax obligatory, counting the amount of owed tax that they have to pay, pay the tax by themselves to the bank or post office and report it to KPP (tax service office). Tax revenue is achieved, among others, from the tax payment and also imposition payment if the tax obligatory has broken the certainty of taxation regulations.  One of them is income tax section 25 payment; it is tax payment on fiscal year in accordance with current payment concept. Each month the payment of PPh section 25 is counted based on PPh of SPT a year before then minus tax credit and divided in 12, in other words; based on the last year benefit which is not reflecting the actual condition of tax obligatory (fictive stelsel), and in the end of the year; it will give the influence in the owed tax. Moreover, this is added by imposition of doubt in case of PPh section 25 that unpaid or minus in payment in the form of interest on 2%  each month on PPh section 25 that unpaid or minus payment.  Those two things about is not in accordance with final liability concept which states that the obligation for income tax would become owed tax in the end of the year.  In addition the doubt would be imposed if the actual income has been known.  In the fiscal year, actuality, the tax obligatory does not owe in Income Tax yet.  So it is not precisely if the Directorate General of Tax department impose a doubt in the form of interest (written on Letter of Tax Claim/Surat Tagihan Pajak/STP) on the PPh payment in fiscal year (PPh 25).  However in the fact, the STP of PPh 25 which unpaid or minus in payment is still brought up continually.