Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Priviet Social Sciences Journal Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Syarofi, Syarofi
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Justice court versus social media court Syarofi, Syarofi
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i12.1126

Abstract

The development of digital technology, particularly social media, has significantly transformed the dynamics of Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Social media now functions as a public platform that shapes public opinion even before formal legal proceedings commence, giving rise to the phenomenon of "trial by social media." This study analyzes the fundamental differences between formal investigative mechanisms based on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and information dissemination mechanisms on social media, as well as their implications for the objectivity, independence, and legitimacy of law enforcement officials. This study employs normative legal methods with qualitative analysis of legislation, legal literature, digital journals, and viral case studies in Indonesia, such as the Vina Cirebon and Mario Dandy cases. The findings indicate that social media rapidly influences public opinion through emotional and simplified narratives, whereas formal justice mechanisms prioritize structured, evidence-based, and procedural processes over emotional narratives. The virality of cases on social media can generate psychological and institutional pressure, threaten investigative objectivity and integrity, and potentially undermine the presumption of innocence. This study highlights the need for digital literacy, transparency in judicial processes, and effective legal communication to ensure that emotional social media narratives do not compromise due process, thereby safeguarding independent, objective, and evidence-based justice for sexual assault victims.
Perlindungan Hukum Notaris Atas Nilai Nominal Transaksi Riil Terhadap Nilai Perhitungan Pajak Yang Melebihi Nilai Transaksi Riil Syarofi, Syarofi; Fathurrahman, Fathurrahman
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lexstricta.v4i3.1826

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal protection of notaries regarding the nominal transaction values in sale and purchase deeds that differ from the BPHTB tax base set by local government authorities. The research focuses on three aspects: the credibility of notaries when transaction values are inconsistent, the responsibility of notaries if the sale and purchase is canceled, and the duties and limits of notaries’ accountability concerning tax value corrections. This research employs a normative qualitative approach using literature review, statutory and regulatory analysis, court decisions, academic literature, and notary professional codes of ethics. Data were analyzed through grammatical, systematic, and teleological legal interpretation, as well as harmonization between notarial and taxation regulations. The findings indicate that: (1) notary credibility is maintained as long as formal authority is exercised and the principle of prudence is applied, although value discrepancies may cause negative perceptions; (2) notaries are not responsible for transaction values when a sale is canceled, provided there is no proven intent or negligence; and (3) the notary’s responsibility is limited to the formal accuracy of the deed and does not include the validation of market or tax value, unless ethical violations or active involvement in value manipulation are proven. The study concludes that legal protection, clear limitation of authority, and application of prudence principles are essential to preserve notarial professionalism while ensuring legal certainty and fiscal compliance.
Co-Authors Fathurrahman Fathurrahman