Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Kehormatan dalam Aturan Pandangan dan Sentuhan antar Mahram Menurut Mazhab Syafi‘i Husnul Furqon; Muhammad Amar Adly
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v3i1.1450

Abstract

This article examines in depth the concept of protecting human dignity through the regulation of gaze and physical contact among mahram according to the Shafi‘i School of Islamic law. From an Islamic perspective, the preservation of dignity (ḥifẓ al-‘irḍ) occupies a highly fundamental position as part of the objectives of Islamic law, particularly in regulating social relations and family interactions. Although mahram relationships legally allow closer interaction, Islam continues to establish ethical boundaries to safeguard purity and moral values. This study is a normative legal research employing conceptual and normative-fiqh approaches, relying on primary sources such as the Qur’an, the Prophetic traditions (hadith), and classical as well as contemporary Shafi‘i jurisprudential literature. The findings indicate that the Shafi‘i School does not regard mahram relations as a sphere of absolute and unrestricted freedom, but instead provides clear regulations concerning gaze and physical contact. Visual interaction is permitted in a limited manner, restricted to certain parts of the body and subject to the condition that it does not provoke desire or potential moral temptation (fitnah). Meanwhile, physical contact is regulated more strictly and, in principle, is only permitted in situations of legitimate shar‘i necessity, such as medical treatment or emergency circumstances. Therefore, the regulation of gaze and physical contact among mahram in the Shafi‘i School functions as an instrument for protecting human dignity, preserving the sanctity of family relationships, and preventing behavioral deviations from an early stage.
Batas Usia Perkawinan dalam Hukum Islam dan Hukum Negara: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Husnul Furqon; Sukiati Sukiati; Iwan Nasution
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v3i2.3149

Abstract

This study analyzes the minimum age of marriage in Islamic jurisprudence and compares it with the positive law regulations in Indonesia and Malaysia. Using a normative legal method with comparative and conceptual approaches, the study draws on primary sources, including the Qur'an, hadith, Law Number 16 of 2019 on Marriage in Indonesia, and the Islamic Family Law (Federal Territories) Act 1984 in Malaysia. The analysis focuses on how Islamic legal principles concerning marriage eligibility are interpreted and incorporated into contemporary legal frameworks in both countries. The findings reveal that Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) associates marital readiness with the concept of baligh (puberty) without prescribing a specific numerical age, whereas state law establishes fixed minimum age requirements to safeguard the rights and welfare of women and children. Indonesia sets the minimum marriage age at 19 years for both males and females, while Malaysia prescribes 18 years for males and 16 years for females, with judicial dispensation available in both jurisdictions under certain circumstances. These legal arrangements demonstrate each country's effort to harmonize classical Islamic jurisprudence with contemporary social protection objectives through institutional ijtihad, reflecting a balance between religious principles, legal certainty, and public welfare in regulating marriage.
Nusyuz dalam Fiqh dan Praktik Modern Husnul Furqon; Heri Firmansyah
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3148

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concept of nusyuz from a classical Islamic jurisprudence perspective and its relevance in modern legal practice, against the backdrop of tensions between patriarchal understandings of Islamic jurisprudence and the values ​​of equality and justice. This study employed a normative legal method (library research) with a juridical-normative and conceptual approach, and analyzed qualitatively through content analysis and the maqasid al-sharia approach. The results indicate that the concept of nusyuz in classical Islamic jurisprudence is primarily directed toward wives, based on Surah An-Nisa', verse 34, while the concept of nusyuz for husbands, in Surah An-Nisa', verse 128, is less developed proportionally. In modern legal practice in Indonesia, this concept is still used in the Compilation of Islamic Law and religious courts, but has shifted toward a more contextual and equitable approach. Therefore, a reconstruction of the understanding of nusyuz is necessary to align it with the principles of justice and equality, so that it is no longer understood as a form of domination, but rather as a violation of shared commitments within the household that can be committed by both parties.