Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurist Argumentum Pemikiran Intelektual Hukum Jurnal Teknologi dan Bisnis Cerdas
Ramadani, Mia
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGEMBANGAN APLIKASI WEB UNTUK MANAJEMEN LAYANAN KESEHATAN (E-HEALTH SYSTEM): SEBUAH TINJAUAN SISTEMATIS LITERATUR Yogia Ananda, Syakila; Aprinda, Cici; Ramadani, Mia; Awaluddin, Awaluddin; Al Khudri, Said; Dayanti, Dayanti
Jurnal Teknologi dan Bisnis Cerdas Vol 2 No 1 (2026): Volume 2 Nomor 1 (Maret 2026)
Publisher : Plexi Digital Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64476/jtbc.v2i1.24

Abstract

The rapid development of digital health technology has encouraged the adoption of web- based applications to improve the accessibility, efficiency, and quality of healthcare services. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on the development of Web-Based Applications for Health Service Management (E-Health System) published between 2020 and 2025. A total of 20 empirical and review studies were selected from reputable databases using the PRISMA 2020 framework. The review identifies five dominant thematic findings: (1) increasing use of telemedicine and patient portals during and after the COVID-19 pandemic;  (2)  the importance of usability and  e-health  literacy for user adoption;  (3) interoperability and integration challenges with Electronic Health Records (EHR); (4) data security, privacy protection, and trust issues; and (5) implementation barriers in low- and middle-income countries, including infrastructure and regulatory limitations. The findings indicate that web-based e-health applications provide significant potential to enhance healthcare delivery performance, yet their successful implementation requires user-centered design, standardized interoperability, robust information security, and supportive public policies. This study contributes to future research by highlighting critical development factors and offering recommendations for more inclusive, secure, and sustainable e-health implementation.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HAKIMYANG TIDAK LENGKAP (ONVOLDOENDE GEMOTIVEERD) DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA DI BAWAH ANCAMAN PIDANA MINIMAL DALAM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 46/PID.SUS/2023/PN MRN) Ramadani, Mia
Jurist Argumentum: Pemikiran Intelektual Hukum Vol 3, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jjm.v3i2.14875

Abstract

The contents that must be contained in a court decision are regulated in the provisions of Article 50 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power and Article 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. A decision that does not meet these provisions is an incomplete decision or insufficient consideration (onvoldoende gemotiveerd). Meuredu District Court Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mrn is a decision in a narcotics crime case where the Defendant is subject to Article 112 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, the minimum penalty for which is 4 (four) years in prison. However, the Panel of Judges imposed a prison sentence under the minimum penalty, namely 2 (two) years in prison without stating and explaining the legal basis used as a reference in imposing a sentence under the minimum penalty. This research aims to find out and analyze whether the judge's considerations in Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mrn do not contain complete legal considerations and what are the legal consequences of the judge's decision whose considerations are incomplete. This research is a normative legal research using the statutory approach method and case approach. Data sources were obtained from literature review and secondary data, namely primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials which were analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that the judge's consideration in Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mrn, was an insufficient consideration because the judge did not include SEMA Number 3 of 2015 which is a legal basis that legitimizes judges to be able to deviate from the minimum criminal provisions in narcotics crimes. So that this decision does not create legal certainty and legal remedies need to be taken to be able to correct mistakes in the application of law by judges. These legal remedies are ordinary legal remedies or extraordinary legal remedies.
Co-Authors Al Khudri, Said Aprinda, Cici Awaluddin Awaluddin Dayanti, Dayanti Yogia Ananda, Syakila