Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Reflection on Gender Role Inequality in Domestic Relations Through Paris Paloma’s Song ‘Labour’: A Fiqh Al-Usrah Perspective Hasanah Harahap, Nurizka
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v5i5.1219

Abstract

Labor Paris Paloma's work speaks volumes anger Woman to inequality role domestic which becomes reflection real How mark equality the often ignored in life everyday . Through sharp metaphors and lyrics , the song This reflect burden double , manipulation emotional and relationship unequal power in realm public and domestic . This article use approach qualitative descriptive For analyze representation gender inequality in lyrics song labor . Through perspective Fiqh al- Usrah , results analysis show that values patriarchal criticism in song the contradictory with Islamic principles about relation a fair , equal and full family love . In Islam, men and women created from the same element ( nafs ) Wahidah ) and has position equal before Allah SWT . Principle morals justice , deliberation , and relations partnership must mainstreamed in distribution role domestic . With Thus , Fiqh al- Usrah give framework ethics at a time law For overcome practice gender inequality in modern family . This study confirm that work culture popular like song can become a reflective medium at a time criticism social to practice religion and culture that have not been fully in favor of gender justice.
A Comparative Analysis of Rationalism Paradigms: An Islamic and Western Perspective Hasanah Harahap, Nurizka; Khudori Soleh, Achmad
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 6 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v6i12.2121

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concept of rationalism from both Islamic and Western perspectives through a comparative approach. Previous research indicates that the two traditions share the use of reason as an epistemic instrument, yet differ significantly in their sources of truth, methodological foundations, and philosophical orientations. This research employs a library-based method with a philosophical-descriptive approach to examine the ideas of key thinkers from both traditions. The findings reveal that Western rationalism grounds truth in the autonomy of human reason through deductive methods, methodological skepticism, and the coherence theory of truth. In contrast, Islamic rationalism integrates reason with divine revelation, particularly in interpreting theological and metaphysical realities. These distinctions influence the development of scientific thought, the structure of epistemology, and ethical orientations within each civilization. This study concludes that Islamic rationalism is characterized by a theocentric-integrative framework, whereas Western rationalism tends to be anthropocentric and secular. The results of this research are expected to contribute to the discourse on comparative epistemology and provide a foundation for further studies on the integration of knowledge.