Putra, Niki Dian Permana
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES BERPIKIR KRITIS PADA MATERI BUMI DAN TATASURYA Putra, Niki Dian Permana; Harahap, Aulia Ilal Hamdi
Jurnal Kumparan Fisika Vol. 8 No. 2: Agustus 2025
Publisher : Unib Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jkf.8.2.41-50

Abstract

ABSTRAK   Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di MTsN 1 Andalan Pekanbaru dengan 25 siswa di kelas VIII. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan instrumen tes berpikir kritis yang valid dan reliabel, untuk mengetahui daya beda, tingkat kesukaran serta keberfungsian pengecoh (distraktor) dari instrumen tes berpikir kritis yang dihasilkan. Penelitian ini menghasilkan instrumen tes berpikir kritis pada materi bumi dan tata surya yang terdiri dari 20 soal (10 pilihan ganda, 10 esay). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian jenis R&D (research and development) dengan menggunakan model ADDIE (analysis, design, develop, implementation, evaluation). Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu wawancara yang dilakukan terhadap narasumber yaitu salah satu guru IPA di lokasi penelitian. Teknik analisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis kualitatif dan kuantitatif, analisis kualitatif digunakan untuk uji validitas empiris dan analisis kuantitatif digunakan untuk uji validitas butir soal, reliabilitas, daya beda, tingkat kesukaran dan distraktor. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan untuk uji validitas yang telah dilakukan oleh 5 validator yang terdiri dari 3 dosen dan 2 guru IPA, baik validitas empiris maupun validitas butir soal sudah memenuhi kriteria valid. Adapun hasil uji reliabilitas yang telah dilakukan diketahui bahwa instrumen tes sudah memenuhi kriteria reliabel. Berdasarkan hasil analisis tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa instrumen tes berpikir kritis yang telah dihasilkan oleh peneliti layak untuk digunakan dalam proses evaluasi pembelajaran di sekolah.   Kata  kunci: Instrumen tes, Berpikir kritis, Bumi dan tata surya   ABSTRACT   This research was carried out at MTsN 1 Andalan Pekanbaru with 25 students in class VIII. This research aims to produce a critical thinking test instrument that is valid and reliable, to determine the different power, level of difficulty and the function of distractors from the critical thinking test instrument produced. This research produced a critical thinking test instrument on earth and solar system material consisting of 20 questions (10 multiple choice, 10 essays). This research is an R&D (research and development) type research using the ADDIE (analysis, design, develop, implementation, evaluation) model. The data collection technique used was interviews conducted with the resource person, namely one of the science teachers at the research location. The analysis technique in this research uses qualitative and quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis is used to test empirical validity and quantitative analysis is used to test the validity of question items, reliability, differentiability, level of difficulty and distractors. Based on the results of research that has been carried out to test validity which has been carried out by 5 validators consisting of 3 lecturers and 2 science teachers, both empirical validity and the validity of the question items have met the valid criteria. As for the results of the reliability tests that have been carried out, it is known that the test instruments have met the reliability criteria. Based on the results of this analysis, it can be concluded that the critical thinking test instrument that has been produced by researchers is suitable for use in the learning evaluation process in schools.   Keywords: Test instruments, Critical thinking, Earth and solar system
Assessment Trends in Science Learning in Junior High School: A Systematic Review Syafira, Annisa; kurniawati, Yenni; Siagian, Liza Maulida; Putra, Niki Dian Permana
QUANTUM: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains Vol 16, No 2 (2025): Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/quantum.v16i2.22083

Abstract

Effective assessment practices are essential in improving science education, yet determining the most suitable types of assessment for junior high school science remains a challenge. Current assessment practices often focus heavily on cognitive outcomes, with less emphasis on evaluating students’ scientific process skills and attitudes. This study aims to identify and analyze the most effective assessment methods used in junior high school science education over the past decade. A systematic review method was employed to collect and examine relevant peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2024. The review reveals a growing trend in the use of authentic assessment, which includes performance tasks, project-based learning assessments, and portfolios. Authentic assessment is identified as the most effective approach, as it holistically evaluates students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes in realistic contexts, aligning with the objectives of the national curriculum. The findings suggest that educators and policymakers should prioritize the development and implementation of authentic assessments to foster deeper learning and better prepare students for real-world problem-solving.