Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture and Social Studies Ma'mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law
Muis, Moch. Zulkarnain
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengangkatan Anak dalam Putusan Nomor 213/Pdt.P/2019/Pa.Kab.Kdr Moch. Zulkarnain Muis; Izatul Abidah; Mufarrohah .; Nailufar Amalia; Rofiatud Darojah; Romlah, Septiana Nadzifatul Yazidah; Adelia Safitri, Ahmad Waisul Qorony
Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020): Juni
Publisher : Laboratorium Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3647.118 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/mal.v1i3.12

Abstract

Abstract: This article discusses adoption in Islamic legislation and law (Decision Study Number 213/Pdt.P /2019 /PA.Kab.Kdr.). Adoption according to the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia is a legal act that transfers a child from the sphere of authority of the parent, legal guardian, or other person responsible for the care, education and raising of the child into the family environment of the adoptive parent. . Adoption According to Islam is to take someone else's child to be cared for and educated with care and affection, without being given the status of a biological child, to him only he is treated by his adoptive parents as his own child. Decision number 213 / Pdt.P / 2019 / PA.Kab.Kdr. is the adoption decision made by Petitioner I, who is 46 years old and Petitioner II, who is 43 years old, who are both Muslims and reside in Kediri Regency. Decision number 213 / Pdt.P / 2019 / PA.Kab.Kdr. regarding the adoption of children that were granted by the panel of judges on July 8, 2019 is in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations and in accordance with the provisions of applicable Islamic law. Keywords: Adoption, Islamic Law, Legislation Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang pengangkatan anak dalam perundang-undangan dan hukum Islam (Studi Putusan Nomor 213/Pdt.P/2019/PA.Kab.Kdr.). Pengangkatan anak menurut Perundang- Undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia adalah suatu perbuatan hukum yang mengalihkan seorang anak dari lingkungan kekuasaan orang tua, wali yang sah, atau orang lain yang bertanggung jawab atas perawatan, pendidikan dan membesarkan anak tersebut, ke dalam lingkungan keluarga orang tua angkat. Pengangkatan anak menurut Islam adalah mengambil anak orang lain untuk diasuh dan dididik dengan penuh perhatian dan kasih sayang, tanpa diberikan status anak kandung kepadanya cuma ia diperlakukan oleh orang tua angkatnya sebagai anak sendiri. Putusan nomor 213/Pdt.P/2019/PA.Kab.Kdr.adalah putusan pengangkatan anak yang dilakukan oleh pemohon I yang berusia 46 tahun dan Pemohon II yang berusia 43 tahun yang sama-sama beragama Islam dan bertempat tinggal di Kabupaten Kediri. Putusan nomor 213/Pdt.P/2019/PA.Kab.Kdr. tentang pengangkatan anak yang dikabulkan oleh majelis hakim pada 08 Juli 2019 adalah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang- undangan yang berlaku dan sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum Islam yang berlaku. Kata Kunci: Pengangkatan Anak, Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan.  
Ihdad dalam Hukum Islam: Studi Komparasi Pemikiran Imam al-Bâjûrî dan Imam al-Syaukânî Moch. Zulkarnain Muis
Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Juni
Publisher : Laboratorium Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/mal.v3i3.137

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji pemikiran al-Bâjûrî dan al-Syaukânî mengenai ihdad dalam hukum Islam. Kajian ini merupakan kajian normatif dengan menggunakan  pendekatan komparatif. Artikel menunjukkan bahwa al-Bajuri dan al-Syaukânî memandang bahwa ihdad bagi wanita yang ditinggal meninggal oleh suaminya adalah wajib. Di posisi ini,  perempuan dilarang untuk berhias, memakai perhiasan, mewarnai tubuh, dan memakai pakaian dengan tujuan berhias. Beberapa hal yang diperbolehkan yaitu memakai sedikit wewangian untuk bersuci dan menyisir rambut menggunakan daun bidara. Dalam konteks ihdad, al-Bâjûrî berpendapat bahwa ihdad disunnahkan bagi wanita ditalak raj’i dan ba’in sedangkan al-Syaukâni tidak Bercelak dan memakai pakaian yang diwarna dalam keadaan tertentu boleh bagi al-Bâjûri sedangkan al-Syaukânî melarang. Al-Bâjûri mendasarkan pemikirannya pada pendapat ulama Syâfi’iyyah sedangkan al-Syaukânî pada hadis. Faktor yang mempengaruhi variasi pemikiran keduanya adalah latar belakang pendidikan dan konteks sosial dan politik.
Hukum Bermain Catur Menurut Mazhab Syafi’i dan Mazhab Maliki Muiz, Moch. Zulkarnain
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Desember
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v1i2.1125

Abstract

Abstract: This article discusses the laws of playing chess according to the Syafi'i and Maliki schools. This research is library research and qualitative. Data were collected through the books of the mazhab Syafi'i and Maliki scholars, then the collected data were analyzed descriptively comparatively. The Syafi'i school argues that the law of playing chess is makruh as long as it is not accompanied by gambling, dirty speech, and obligatory worship. The Maliki school argues that playing chess is haram because it is similar to dice. Based on the comparative analysis, the Syafi'i school and the Maliki school agree that it is forbidden to play chess if it is accompanied by gambling and if it causes dirty speech and neglects obligatory worship. The two schools differ in their opinion regarding the law of playing chess that the Syafi'i mazhab requires playing chess based on the fiqh rule "everything is allowed" and there is no clear passage about the law of playing chess. Meanwhile, the Maliki school of law forbids playing chess by accepting it with dice games. Keywords: Chess, Syafi'i school, Maliki school, Islamic law, comparative. Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang hukum bermain catur menurut mazhab Syafi’i dan mazhab Maliki. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian pustaka dan kualitatif. Pengambilan data dilakukan melalui kitab-kitab karya ulama mazhab Syafi’i dan ulama mazhab Maliki, kemudian data yang terkumpul dianalisis secara deskriptif komparatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa mazhab Syafi’i berpendapat bahwa hukum bermain catur adalah makruh jika tidak disertai dengan judi, perkataan kotor dan melupakan ibadah wajib. Mazhab Maliki berpendapat bahwa bermain catur hukumnya haram. Permainan catur sama dengan permainan dadu. Berdasarkan analisis komparatif, mazhab Syafi’i dan mazhab Maliki sepakat mengharamkan bermain catur jika disertai dengan judi, dan jika menyebabkan keluarnya ucapan kotor dan melalaikan ibadah wajib. Kedua mazhab tersebut berbeda pendapat dalam hal hukum bermain catur, bahwa mazhab Syafi’i memakruhkan bermain catur berdasarkan kaidah fikih “al-ashl fi al-ashya’ al-ibahah/segala sesuatu adalah boleh”, karena tidak ada nas yang secara jelas menjelaskan tentang hukum bermain catur. Sedangkan mazhab Maliki mengharamkan secara mutlak hukum bermain catur dengan mengqiyaskannya dengan permainan dadu. Kata Kunci: Catur, mazhab Syafi’i, mazhab Maliki, hukum Islam, komparasi.
Religious Moderation in the Scout Movement (Gerakan Pramuka): The Role of the 2023 National Raimuna in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals Point 16 Nunuk Hidayati; Muis, Moch. Zulkarnain
Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Alumni dan Santri Mahyajatul Qurro'

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53754/hgba6z60

Abstract

As a pluralistic nation, Indonesia continues to face challenges regarding violations of religious freedom, making strengthening religious moderation crucial to prevent extremism and build social harmony. This study analyzes the practice of religious moderation in the context of a large-scale nonformal education event, the 2023 National Raimuna of the Scout Movement, and examines its contribution to the targets of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through open-ended questionnaires, participant observation, document analysis, and reviews of official archives. The analysis was conducted inductively using source and technique triangulation. The results show that the four indicators of religious moderation were empirically realized through structured activities such as the Beranda Nusantara forum and cultural carnival, supported by event regulations that ensured inclusivity and non-violence. These practices make significant contributions to SDG 16 targets, particularly the reduction of violence (16.1), strengthening institutional accountability (16.6), inclusive participation (16.7), and non-discriminatory policies (16. b). However, the study identified several challenges, including selective recruitment mechanisms, the temporary and controlled nature of the event, the potential for hidden resistance, and logistical capacity constraints. In response, it is recommended to develop a structured module based on religious moderation indicators for local scout units (Gugus Depan), provide dialogue facilitation competency training for mentors, implement a post-event mentoring mechanism based on personal action plans, and formulate a standard operational protocol for inclusive logistics. Further quantitative and longitudinal studies are necessary to measure the long-term impact and sustainability of value internalization.
Unregistered Marriage among University Students: Family Influence, Religious Legitimacy, and the Negotiation of Marriage Law Muis, Moch. Zulkarnain; Hidayati, Nunuk; Kusumo, Muhammad Trenggono
Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): December (In Progress)
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.2.176-203

Abstract

Unregistered marriages (nikah siri) are often placed within a rigid dichotomy between religious legitimacy and state legality. However, the lived experiences and legal awareness of those involved are frequently overlooked. This article examines the motives, meanings, and lived experiences of unregistered marriage practices among undergraduate students at Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya, Indonesia. This article is an empirical legal study that employs a socio-legal approach grounded in phenomenological theory. By engaging three married students, selected through purposive sampling, data were collected via in-depth interviews and analyzed using phenomenological reduction—including bracketing and eidetic reduction—to uncover the essential structure of the participants’ consciousness. This article demonstrates that unregistered marriage is not perceived as a legal violation but rather as a contextual response to the religious, social, and economic conditions faced. The primary motives identified include avoiding adultery, preserving family honor, and achieving economic efficiency. Participants interpret an unregistered marriage as valid under religious law, even though it is not recognized by the state, reflecting a dualism between religious legitimacy and legal validity. In practice, the fulfillment of the rights and obligations of husband and wife is negotiated contextually based on agreement, responsibility, and spiritual commitment, including in decisions to postpone living together and pregnancy. This article argues that unregistered marriages among students are not entirely based on defiance of state law but rather a solution to social conflicts within families
Co-Authors Adelia Safitri, Ahmad Waisul Qorony Hidayati, Nunuk Izatul Abidah Kusumo, Muhammad Trenggono Mufarrohah . Nailufar Amalia Nunuk Hidayati Rofiatud Darojah Romlah, Septiana Nadzifatul Yazidah