p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal RISA
Prajudi Herwindo, Rahadian
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

STUDI PENJAJARAN CANDI BUDDHA DI PADANG LAWAS, SUMATRA UTARA DAN MATARAM KUNO Taruli Ayeris, Pininta; Prajudi Herwindo, Rahadian
Jurnal Riset Arsitektur Vol 7 No 01 (2023): RISET ARSITEKTUR "RISA"
Publisher : Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/risa.v7i01.6362.66-83

Abstract

Abstract - Temple architecture or candi architecture is one of the oldest architectures found in Indonesia also the world, the word ‘candi’ comes from the word candika grha which means the house of the goddess of death, but Soekmono (1977:231) said that the temple isn’t always considered a tomb, rather a temple building. The Padang Lawas Buddhist temples that were taken as research objects consisted of Bahal Temples I, II, III and Sipamutung Temple, juxtaposed with the Buddhist temples of Ancient Mataram, Central Java. The architectural elements of Padang Lawas Buddhist temples have unique architectural patterns and are different from the architecture of Javanese Buddhist temples in general. Construction estimated, from the 9th - 13th centuries for the architecture of temples in Sumatra are also supported by the fact that Srivijaya Kingdom in Sumatra, was the earliest centre of the spread of Buddhism (4th century) before Ancient Mataram. Architecture of the Buddhist temples of Padang Lawas and throughout Sumatra does not yet have clear characteristics when compared to Javanese temples, which have guidelines and characteristics that have been studied more vastly. Sumatra’s candi architecture is unique, portraying a different image from the temples in Java, thus this reason is used as a research study of the alignment study between the Buddhist temples of Padang Lawas and Ancient Mataram (Mataram Kuno). This study is done to understand the differences and similarities of the temple architecture built in different areas and the factors that influence the similarities and differences of temple architecture. Architectural data of the Buddhist temples of Padang Lawas and Ancient Mataram based on the research objects that have been mentioned with research with a descriptive-analytic qualitative approach. The architectures of the Buddhist temples of Padang Lawas and Ancient Mataram are aligned to analyse the similarities and differences with the different theories referred from various literatures, books, research paper, and digital data. Sameness, differences, and similarities are analysed from its massing composition, spatial composition, silhouettes or figure, and ornamentation. Thus, influenced by certain factors that give certain uniqueness of its architecture. In this study the factors are derived from natural factors that affect temple architecture, material and engineering factors in relation to its nature, religiousity factors affecting architectural patterns, and socio-cultural-political factors. The conclusion of the analysis is there are many similarities and differences between the Sumatran and Javanese temples within their architectural elements, consisting of mass , space, building figures, and decoration & ornamentation. Few sameness are found, nevertheless many similarities or resemblance are also found and made possible by the absorption of Javanese’s style on Sumatra’s ‘candi’ architecture which was developed based on local wisdom, religiosity, nature, materials and engineering factors. Besides the sameness and similarities, various differences are also found on the architectural elements following its external factors consisting of religiousity, environment-material-technicality, and social-culture-politics. Keywords: Candi Architecture, Buddha, Padang Lawas, Architectural elements
KAJIAN KARYA ARSITEKTUR C.P. WOLFF SCHOEMAKER DAN HENRI MACLAINE PONT DITINJAU DARI PRINSIP ARSITEKTUR NUSANTARA Lawiguna, Handoyo; Prajudi Herwindo, Rahadian
Jurnal Riset Arsitektur Vol 7 No 02 (2023): RISET ARSITEKTUR "RISA"
Publisher : Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/risa.v7i02.6600.117-135

Abstract

Abstract - Charles Prosper Wolff Schoemaker and Henri Maclaine Pont are two Dutch Architects who worked in the Dutch East Indies in 1900 – 1940 period. In this period, architectural identity of Nusantara is being sought by some Dutch architects due to the development of new architectural thinking that involve localities. This thought arises because the old idea doesn’t fit with the geographical context, that the Dutch or “western” architectural thinking still dominating the design. Those two architects, Schoemaker and Pont are two figures that loud enough sounding their toughts and idealism about Nusantara architecutal identity until they often arguing at several forums and papers, initiating their own ideas for developing Nusantara architectural identity. Both are estimated use architectural approach of Nusantara but from two different perspective. This research uses descriptive method with qualitative approach by describing objects from those figures and compare them with Nusantara architectural theories that written by Prof. Josef Prijotomo. Data collected by field observation and literature study. Data grouped by the variables, namely room order, structure – construction- materials, and building figure. Analysis technique are done with connecting data with Nusantara architectural theory and interpret with other theories that support the research for reading the Nusantara architecture at the objects. The result of this research come to a conclusion, that in Schoemaker’s works, Nusantara architecture interpreted with functional and aesthetics approach, that the functional aspect linked with room comfort and the relation with local climate. The aesthetic aspect made by ornament that related with temple. Schoemaker’s design approach is modern – local, that come from modern thought and added some local elements. Contrasts with Schoemaker, Pont almost all local architecture thought applied in his buildings. Pont can read the local context until the root and learn the history, the culture, so that the architecture getting more contextual with the local nature, social, and culture. In his works, Pont almost applied Nusantara architectural theories in room order, structure – construction – materials, or the building figure so it can be concluded that Pont design approach is local – modern, developing and enrich local architecture with modern thought and technologies that can accompany and compelent Nusantara architecture. Keywords: Nusantara architecture, Schoemaker, Pont, modern – local, local - modern