Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN AUDITING Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING) IIJSE
Albahrun, Yudi Basma
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Do Audit Quality Enhancements Improve Financial Reporting Credibility? A Systematic Literature Review Albahrun, Yudi Basma; Lopes, Rui; Kusumawati, Andi; Bandang, Agus
JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN AUDITING Volume 22, Nomor 2, Tahun 2025
Publisher : Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jaa.22.2.233-272

Abstract

This systematic review examines whether, how, and under what conditions audit quality enhancements (AQEs) strengthen financial reporting credibility (FRQ). Following PRISMA procedures, we screened 2015–2025 studies and synthesized 25 core articles; a VOSviewer map highlights three clusters: (i) governance and audit committees, (ii) audit process and policy levers (effort, specialization, rotation/EQCR, ISQM-1/ISA 220, and KAM/CAM design), and (iii) reporting outcomes and earnings management. Overall, AQEs correlate with lower discretionary accruals, timelier loss recognition, fewer restatements, and more disciplined market reactions when risk-based procedures are deep, KAM/CAM are specific, and audit committees and internal audit are effective. Impacts rise with strong enforcement and institutional ownership but weaken under fee pressure, long tenure, or poor governance. We note fragmented FRQ proxies and call for causal designs and observable process-quality measures to isolate mechanisms. The review offers an integrated pathway linking governance and audit processes to reporting credibility and market consequences.
Implementation of Strategic Management in Improving Public Sector Organizational Performance Usman, Asri; Alimuddin, Alimuddin; Albahrun, Yudi Basma; Ahmad, A. Ikhwanul; Kamal, Afrah Namirah
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 9 No 1 (2026): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v9i1.9090

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the roles of strategic management, management accounting, and Government Accounting Standards (SAP) in enhancing the performance of public sector organizations in Indonesia. The research employs a literature review approach by examining relevant national and international academic sources. The findings indicate that the implementation of strategic management strengthens policy effectiveness, cost efficiency, and public legitimacy. Management accounting plays a vital role in supporting data driven decision making, cost control, and performance based budgeting. Meanwhile, the adoption of accrual based SAP contributes to greater fiscal transparency, improved financial reporting quality, and stronger public accountability. However, the implementation of these three instruments continues to face challenges, including limited human resource capacity, bureaucratic resistance, and the suboptimal use of digital technologies. This study underscores that synergy among strategic management, management accounting, and SAP is essential for building transparent, efficient, and adaptive public governance that is responsive to societal needs.
APAKAH PERNYATAAN JAMINAN MENINGKATKAN KREDIBILITAS LAPORAN KEBERLANJUTAN? SEBUAH TINJAUAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS PENELITIAN AKUNTABILITAS PERUSAHAAN Albahrun, Yudi Basma; Jamsir, Muh Faiz Qaidhan; Said, Darwis; Nagu, Nadhirah
Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING) Vol. 8 No. 6 (2025): COSTING : Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31539/na7nyn91

Abstract

This study investigates whether and under what conditions assurance on sustainability reports enhances the credibility of information for users. Drawing on a Systematic Literature Review of indexed publications from 2016–2025, we apply PRISMA procedures and complement the thematic synthesis with VOSviewer-based bibliometric mapping of author collaborations and conceptual clusters. The review finds that credibility gains are strongest when assurance design features are explicit: a clearly specified assurance level (particularly reasonable assurance), the use of recognized standards (ISAE 3000/AA1000AS, with increasing convergence toward ISSA 5000), and a materiality-anchored scope supported by substantive procedures. Provider competence and independence further moderate these outcomes. Institutional determinants including long-term institutional ownership, legal system characteristics, and stakeholder pressure also influence adoption. Documented consequences include improved access to finance, more disciplined market reactions, and favorable evaluations in ESG-linked lending. Conversely, narrow scopes, boilerplate phrasing, or limited assurance without transparent methodology tend to weaken credibility effects. Practical implications highlight the need for clearer disclosure of the linkages between assurance level, standards, and scope in executive summaries, enhanced report readability, strengthened thematic expertise among assurance providers, and regulatory alignment to balance costs and benefits. The paper contributes a “design/provider credibility market consequences” mechanism framework and proposes a concise research agenda to guide scholars, practitioners, and policymakers.
Co-Authors Ahmad, A. Ikhwanul Bandang, Agus Darwis Said, Darwis Jamsir, Muh Faiz Qaidhan Kamal, Afrah Namirah Kusumawati, Andi Lopes, Rui Nagu, Nadhirah Usman, Asri