<![CDATA[Data contracts have emerged as a foundational mechanism for ensuring reliable communication between producers and consumers in modern distributed data ecosystems. They specify expected schemas, semantic intentions, and quality constraints, forming the basis for trustworthy data exchange across pipelines and organizational boundaries. Despite their growing adoption, contract violations remain a persistent operational challenge. These failures frequently stem from subtle schema shifts, unexpected type variations, incomplete records, or semantic inconsistencies introduced during upstream system changes. Traditional validation approaches—often built on static rules or manual inspection—struggle to keep pace with evolving datasets, diverse integration patterns, and continuous delivery cycles. As a result, contract breaches propagate downstream, causing pipeline interruptions, test instability, and avoidable production incidents. This paper presents a machine learning–driven framework designed to anticipate data contract failures before they manifest. The approach draws on both historical and real-time metadata, capturing patterns in schema evolution, anomaly trajectories, operational log signals, and field-level drift behavior. A hybrid modeling strategy is employed, combining gradient-boosted decision trees for structured anomaly detection, temporal drift modules for sequential pattern monitoring, and embedding-based schema representations for high-dimensional contract features. By integrating these components, the system provides early warning indicators that enable teams to intervene proactively rather than react after failures disrupt operations. The framework was evaluated using datasets from financial services, e-commerce platforms, and healthcare systems—domains characterized by diverse data heterogeneity and high operational sensitivity. Across these environments, the model achieved up to 79% accuracy in predicting contract violations, reduced downstream pipeline failures by 42%, and shortened incident triage time by 37%. These results highlight the potential of ML-driven predictive validation as a practical path toward resilient, self-monitoring data infrastructures in enterprise settings.]]>
