Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan
Abid Assidiqi Zahra
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ASPEK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PELAKU USAHA TERHADAP KONSUMEN BERITIKAD BURUK DALAM TRANSAKSI DIGITAL Ghozel Indrawan; Abid Assidiqi Zahra
Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Februari : Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan (JEBER)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/wyg4fy61

Abstract

The rapid development of digital transactions has facilitated interactions between businesses and consumers, but it also poses the risk of bad faith consumers. Bad faith consumers are those who intentionally exploit digital systems to harm businesses, through actions such as identity fraud, misuse of return mechanisms, or manipulation of product reviews and ratings. This phenomenon demands adequate legal protection to prevent businesses from experiencing financial or reputational losses. This article analyzes aspects of legal protection for businesses in digital transactions in Indonesia, based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions and its amendments, and provisions in the Civil Code concerning contracts and defaults. Protection strategies discussed include consumer identity verification, the development of clear transaction terms and conditions, the use of digital contracts, and the implementation of transaction security and monitoring systems. Law enforcement challenges, such as easily manipulated electronic evidence and slow legal procedures, are also examined. In conclusion, a combination of legal protection and technology-based preventive measures is key for businesses to conduct digital transactions safely, effectively, and sustainably.
Dynamics of Gono-Gini Property in Marriage: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesian Civil Law, Islamic Family Law, and Javanese Customary Law Khoirul Dwi Safe’i; Ghozel Indrawan; Hamdan Arifin; Nike Ade Anggaeni; Abid Assidiqi Zahra; Fayyad Akram; Annikmah Farida
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i2.3189

Abstract

The concept of harta gono-gini (joint marital property) constitutes a fundamental pillar of Indonesian family law, reflecting principles of economic justice and shared responsibility between spouses. This study aims to comparatively analyze the regulation and implementation of joint property within three major legal systems operating in Indonesia, namely Indonesian Civil Law, Islamic Family Law, and Javanese Customary Law. Using a normative legal research method supported by limited empirical data, this research examines statutory provisions, legal doctrines, court decisions, and living customary norms related to marital property.The findings reveal that all three legal systems substantively recognize joint property as assets acquired during marriage through the mutual contribution of husband and wife. However, significant differences emerge in their philosophical foundations and mechanisms of distribution. Indonesian Civil Law emphasizes formal legal certainty and tends to apply an equal division principle, while Islamic Family Law prioritizes proportional justice based on both economic and non-economic contributions. Meanwhile, Javanese Customary Law focuses on social harmony, moral values, and contextual fairness, often resolving disputes through family deliberation rather than formal litigation.The coexistence of these legal systems illustrates Indonesia’s legal pluralism, which creates both opportunities for contextual justice and challenges in the form of legal disharmony and jurisdictional overlap. This study concludes that legal pluralism in joint property regulation should be viewed as a legal asset rather than an obstacle. Therefore, an integrative approach to harmonizing national family law is necessary to ensure legal certainty while accommodating substantive justice aligned with Indonesia’s socio-cultural diversity.
Co-Authors Annikmah Farida Fayyad Akram Ghozel Indrawan Hamdan Arifin Khoirul Dwi Safe’i Nike Ade Anggaeni