Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Collaborative Governance Process in Supporting Public Private Partnership in Singkawang Airport Development in 2023-2024 Maya Novita Sari; Nandang Alamsah Deliarnoor; Novie Indrawati Sagita
Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (Febru
Publisher : Dinasti Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/dijemss.v6i3.3946

Abstract

This research is driven by the inadequacies in the collaborative process within the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme, which has hindered the operationalization of Singkawang Airport, despite its inauguration by the President of Indonesia on March 20, 2024. The collaboration involves key actors, including the Central Government through the Ministry of Transportation, the Singkawang City Government, PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia, CSR Team and the local community surrounding the airport construction site. Adopting the cross-sector collaboration framework proposed by Bryson, Crosby, and Stone, this study aims to analyze and elucidate the Collaborative Governance process in the development of Singkawang Airport by examining six dimensions: forging initial agreements, building leadership, building legitimacy, building trust, managing conflict, and planning. This study employs a qualitative research method, with data collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. Informants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling techniques. The findings reveal that the Collaborative Governance process in the PPP scheme for Singkawang Airport is partially evident across the six dimensions. The first dimension, forging initial agreements, highlights the absence of formal agreements underpinning the collaboration. The second dimension, building leadership, demonstrates the presence of both formal and informal leadership structures. In the third dimension, building legitimacy, both internal and external legitimacy have been established. The fourth dimension, building trust, reveals that trust-building efforts are limited to periodic meetings conducted several months apart. The fifth dimension, managing conflict, shows a lack of preventive measures necessary to sustain trust. Finally, the sixth dimension, planning, indicates that while initial plans were formulated, they required dynamic adjustments to address emergent challenges during implementation. In conclusion, this study underscores that relying solely on the PPP scheme poses significant challenges to the realization of the airport project. Cross-sector collaboration has accelerated the development process but remains suboptimal, as it does not fully address the six dimensions of effective collaboration.
Evaluation of Village Fund Management Policy in Poverty Alleviation in Majalengka Regency Aay Kandar Nurdiansyah; Nandang Alamsah Deliarnoor; Novie Indrawati Sagita; Risma Pitriani Nuryana
Research Horizon Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Research Horizon - February 2026
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.6.1.2026.1025

Abstract

This study is motivated by the critical role of village funds in enhancing community welfare and alleviating poverty in Indonesia. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of village fund management in poverty alleviation efforts in Majalengka Regency using policy evaluation criteria. Employing a qualitative research approach with a descriptive design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation involving village government officials, village institutions, and community members. Data analysis was conducted using William Dunn’s policy evaluation framework, which encompasses six criteria: effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and appropriateness. The findings indicate that the management of village funds has generally been effective, with programs such as infrastructure development, direct cash assistance, food security initiatives, community empowerment, and the development of village-owned enterprises contributing to improved welfare and poverty reduction. The criteria of effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, responsiveness, and appropriateness were assessed as satisfactory, whereas equity requires further attention due to the uneven distribution of benefits. The study highlights the need for more equitable distribution and inclusive community participation to strengthen the long-term impact of village funds, ensuring that their management is sustainable and fosters inclusive local development.