Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Literature Review: Factors Affecting Productivity in Mining Industries Mochammad Mukti Ali; Aidil Arifin; Aris Setiyani
Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science (Decem
Publisher : Dinasti Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/dijemss.v7i2.5876

Abstract

Mining remains an indispensable pillar of the global economy, supplying essential resources for construction, manufacturing, and the ongoing energy transition. Yet across the last decade, productivity growth in mining industries has been inconsistent despite enormous technological advances and increased investment in mechanisation and digitalisation. This literature review synthesises over 50 peer-reviewed studies and industry reports published between 2015 and 2025 to identify and evaluate the main factors influencing productivity in global mining operations. The analysis groups findings into seven thematic categories: (1) human capital and organisational culture, (2) equipment utilisation and maintenance practices, (3) technological adoption and automation, (4) geological and environmental constraints, (5) supply-chain and logistics efficiency, (6) regulatory and sustainability pressures, and (7) macroeconomic and cyclical influences. Recent evidence shows that the productivity gap between high-performing and average mines is widening, driven not by resource quality alone but by differences in managerial capability, data utilisation, and operational integration. Emerging literature emphasises that productivity enhancement requires a holistic, system-based approach that combines technological innovation with workforce competence, sustainability alignment, and governance reform. The review concludes that the next decade will demand a re-conceptualization of productivity from narrow cost-per-tonne metrics toward integrated measures of digital efficiency, environmental resilience, and social value creation.
A Systematic Literature Review: Performance Pathways and Firm Performance Implications Gurawan Dayona Ismail; Aidil Arifin; Yusup Maulana; Ardiyatur Rahman; Stevanus Dwi Citra Widharsana
Dinasti International Journal of Management Science Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (January - February 2026)
Publisher : Dinasti Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/dijms.v7i3.6180

Abstract

It has long been known that leadership plays a crucial role in determining both organizational success and worker performance. Scholarly interest in comprehending how leadership affects employee productivity and how these individual level results transfer into company success has been rekindled in recent years due to increased global rivalry, digital change, and post-pandemic work arrangements. In order to compile empirical data on the relationship between leadership, employee productivity and performance, and organizational or company performance, this study does a systematic literature review (SLR) of worldwide peer-reviewed journal publications published between 2020 and 2025. Using the PRISMA 2020 technique as a guide, 68 outstanding studies were located and submitted to thematic synthesis analysis. According to the review, employee performance and productivity are continuously positively correlated with leadership styles, especially transformational, servant, ethical, inclusive, empowering, and strengths-based leadership. However, psychological, relational, and behavioral mechanisms like job engagement, motivation, trust, leader-member interchange, and organizational identification influence these benefits, which are primarily indirect. Although there is some evidence, it is still dispersed and mostly comes from multi-level or branch-level research that show a substantial correlation between staff productivity and firm-level performance. In addition to highlighting important research gaps, such as the absence of longitudinal designs, inconsistent productivity measurements, and a dearth of multi-level studies, this review suggests an integrative performance pathway model. The significance of leadership development systems that institutionalize engagement and alignment methods to translate employee performance increases into long-term company performance is highlighted by practical consequences.