Abd Razak Musahib
Universitas Madako

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Implementation of Restorative Justice for Misdemeanor Crimes after Perpol No. 8 of 2021 Ichsan Sjuhudi; Abd Razak Musahib
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): Ipso Jure - June
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/3hw99x77

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of restorative justice to minor crimes in the Indonesian criminal justice system, especially after the issuance of Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021. The shift from a retributive approach to a restorative approach is a response to the failure of the conventional criminal system in achieving substantive justice and overcrowding in correctional institutions. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that restorative justice has strong theoretical legitimacy through the conceptĀ  of reintegrative shaming and normative support from Law No. 11 of 2012 and Perpol No. 8 of 2021. However, its implementation faces juridical and institutional challenges, especially related to the hierarchy of norms, accountability, and the understanding of law enforcement officials and the public towards the concept of restorative justice. It also found potential irregularities if there is no strict supervision of the peace mechanism outside the formal process. Therefore, there is a need for harmonization of regulations, integrated training for officials, and the participation of civil society in the supervision of implementation. This study recommends the reform of the Criminal Code and the establishment of inter-institutional regulations to ensure that restorative justice becomes a valid, effective, and just approach in national criminal law enforcement.
Corporate Criminal Responsibility in Environmental Crimes: a Case Study of Industrial Pollution Kemmala Dewi; Abd Razak Musahib; Mustofa Ponco Wibowo
Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): JOSI - MARCH
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/wp2z3b67

Abstract

Criminal law enforcement against companies in environmental crime cases still faces significant challenges. Although Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (PPLH Law) has regulated criminal sanctions for companies that pollute the environment, its implementation is still weak. The main factors that hinder the effectiveness of law enforcement include difficulties in proving criminal elements, weak capacity of law enforcement officials, and political and economic pressures that benefit polluting companies. In addition, corruption, overlapping authority between institutions, and inequality between regulations and implementation are the main obstacles in criminally ensnaring companies. The principles of strict liability and corporate criminal liability that are expected to ensnare polluting companies are still not applied optimally. Legal reform is needed to strengthen the effectiveness of environmental criminal law enforcement, including through increasing the capacity of law enforcement officers, improving regulations, and implementing stricter sanctions such as the revocation of business licenses. Information transparency, inter-agency coordination, and protection for whistleblowers must also be strengthened. With these steps, it is hoped that environmental law enforcement can be more effective in providing a deterrent effect to polluting companies, ensuring corporate criminal responsibility, and upholding the principles of environmental justice in Indonesia.