Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Public Health Indonesian Leges Privatae Journal of Adat Recht
Theresia N.A Narwadan
Universitas Pattimura
Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Social Media as a Health Promotion Tool: Between Education and Misinformation Theresia N.A Narwadan; Seno Lamsir
Journal of Public Health Indonesian Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November-JHH
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/1788df52

Abstract

Social media has become a central instrument for health promotion in Indonesia, yet it simultaneously serves as a fertile environment for health-related disinformation. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of how social media functions in these dual roles both as a tool for health education and a channel for misinformation using a mixed-method integrative review approach. A total of 62 eligible articles were analyzed using thematic synthesis integrating quantitative and qualitative findings. The results reveal that social media can enhance the reach of health education through multimodal content, personalized messaging, and community engagement. However, engagement-driven algorithms, low digital health literacy, and the influence of non-expert figures enable disinformation to spread more rapidly than accurate information. These dynamics highlight the necessity for systemic interventions, including stronger information governance, improved health literacy programs, collaborations with content creators, and platform-level reforms that reduce the visibility of misleading content. The study concludes that social media can only function effectively as a health promotion tool if its educational potential is balanced with comprehensive and contextually grounded strategies to mitigate disinformation.
Rethinking Civil Law Protection in Unequal Societies Theresia N.A Narwadan
Leges Privatae Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): DECEMBER-JOY
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/jzv9jz58

Abstract

Civil law is traditionally grounded in the assumption of formal equality among legal subjects, presuming that private autonomy and freedom of contract operate under conditions of equivalent bargaining power. In unequal societies, however, civil law relations are frequently shaped by structural disparities in economic resources, access to information, and social position. This article examines the normative foundations of civil law protection in the context of social inequality and questions the adequacy of formal equality as a basis for justice in private legal relations. Using normative juridical research with statute, conceptual, and case approaches, this study identifies normative ambiguity in civil law regarding the criteria for legally relevant inequality, the limits of restricting freedom of contract, and the consistency of legal protection across private relations. The analysis demonstrates that such ambiguity weakens legal certainty and renders civil law protection fragmented and ineffective. This article argues for a normative reconstruction of civil law protection grounded in substantive justice, treating private autonomy as a conditional principle and positioning civil law as a constitutional instrument for correcting structural inequality.
The Existence of Customary Law as a Living Law within Indonesia’s Legal System: A Legal Pluralism Analysis Theresia N.A Narwadan
Journal of Adat Recht Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): NOVEMBER-JOAR
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/2rw71057

Abstract

This study analyzes the existence of customary law as a living law within Indonesia’s legal system through the paradigm of legal pluralism. Although Indonesia adopts a codified national legal system, customary law continues to function as a normative authority that regulates community behavior and dispute resolution. Using a normative juridical method supported by doctrinal analysis, this research reveals that the interaction between statutory law and customary law is characterized by philosophical and functional differences that frequently produce normative conflicts, particularly in land regulation, community sanctions and criminal justice. The findings indicate that effective harmonization requires a clear doctrinal placement of customary law within the national hierarchy, in which customary law governs culturally embedded communal affairs while statutory law prevails in constitutional and criminal matters. This structured pluralism model ensures legal certainty while preserving cultural identity. The study concludes that balanced normative coexistence is necessary to strengthen both legal legitimacy and cultural justice in Indonesia
Co-Authors Seno Lamsir