Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Identitas
Husnul Atiyah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Mengayun Di Antara Liberalisme Dan Nasionalisme Pasar? Telaah Pelarangan Ekspor Biji Mentah dan Arah Politik Ekonomi Indonesia Husnul Atiyah
Jurnal Identitas Volume 3 Number 2, September 2023
Publisher : Institut Kewarganegaraan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66109/jid.vi.4

Abstract

On January 1, 2020, the Indonesian government officially banned the export of raw nickel ore because nickel reserves are increasingly depleting as non-renewable energy. This decision caused a strong reaction and criticism from the European Union and resulted in a lawsuit against the World Trade Organization (WTO). In the context of academic discourse, this problem also raises questions about whether Indonesia’s political economy direction is moving towards market liberalism or nationalism. This is because several recent policies or regulations issued by the government could not simply tell the direction of Indonesia’s political economy ideology. Based on literature research, this paper intends to discuss the above issues in the context of international political economy. This article finds that the direction of the Indonesian economy is swinging between liberalism and economic nationalism. Looking at the ban on raw ore export shows this, but more is needed; thus, furthr study is required to suggest the political economy direction adopted by the Indonesian government.
Menggugat Prinsip Non-Interference ASEAN : Dari Idealisme ke Pragmatisme Politik? Husnul Atiyah
Jurnal Identitas Volume 4 Number 1, March 2024
Publisher : Institut Kewarganegaraan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66109/jid.vi.14

Abstract

Several acts of violence that occurred at the national and international levels received attention from various groups. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the Myanmar issue involving the military junta regime have become prominent in recent years. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine, even though it occurred in Eastern Europe, has the potential to have an impact on global security, and is even said to trigger a world war. The violence case in Myanmar, while it occurs on a national (domestic) level, the impacts, especially the violence and abuses of human rights, are extraordinary and are of serious international concern. Both cases sparked criticism from various groups, including the United Nations (UN) at the international level and ASEAN at the regional level. This article discusses ASEAN members’ stance on the two violent incidents that occurred by linking it to the principle of noninterference, one of the principles that are very “ASEAN”. Through literature study, this paper finds that ASEAN’s attitude towards the two cases above is not singular. Each member’s attitude of this Southeast Asian regional organization is different, especially in the case of the Russia and Ukraine conflict. In the case of Myanmar, the attitude shown is also not firm. The description of this attitude is closely related to how they interpret the principle of non-interference, which tends to be political and pragmatic in practice, depending on the interests of their respective countries.
Negara Versus Pasar : Mendiskusikan (Kembali) Arah Kebijakan Politik Ekonomi Indonesia Husnul Atiyah
Jurnal Identitas Volume 5 Number 1, March 2025
Publisher : Institut Kewarganegaraan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66109/jid.vi.44

Abstract

The direction of Indonesia’s economic policy is often a subject of debate among experts. This is partly because various economic policies are often inconsistent. On one hand, there is a tendency for the state to side with the people. However, in other policies, the state tends to favor the market. Indonesia is often said to have adopted a Pancasila economy. Some also refer to it as a people’s economy. However, in practice, the difference between the two is not very clear. Often, these labels merely become political commodities. This article aims to discuss this issue further by examining the policies adopted by the government, especially in the final years of President Jokowi’s administration, namely the issuance of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (Perpu) No. 2 of 2022 On Job Creation (Perppu Cipta Kerja) and the Bauxite Ore Export Ban in 2023. These two policies have elicited a range of reactions, with the first policy being considered too favorable to the market and corporations, while simultaneously causing significant harm to workers. In contrast, the second policy has received many positive responses, even from those who criticized the first policy. Using a literature review method, this article finds that Indonesia’s political economy policies tend not to be based on ideological considerations, but rather on strategic and practical economic calculations and, consequently, are often inconsistent with the ideology they promote. 
Co-Authors