Yuli Prasetyo Adhi
Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Protection of Economic Rights of Copyright Holders of Musical Works (Study of Decision Number: 464 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024) Dewi Sulistianingsih; Renard Kananda Dipta; Andry Setiawan; Yuli Prasetyo Adhi; Hafiz Rafi Uddin
Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January-June, 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lsr.v6i1.29733

Abstract

This study is intended to examine the application of protection of the economic rights of copyright holders of musical works of art as regulated in Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, with a focus on the study of Supreme Court Decision Number 464 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024. This study uses a normative legal approach by collecting data through literature reviews, laws and regulations, official documents, and other legal sources. The problems studied include the form of protection of economic rights in the copyright of musical works and how the legal considerations of the panel of judges in upholding the principle of this protection. The results of the analysis show that economic rights give creators exclusive rights to utilize, reproduce, distribute, and obtain economic benefits from their works. In this case, the Panel of Judges of the Supreme Court concluded that Rahman Efendi as the creator of the song “Nasib Force One Buruk” had his economic rights harmed by Romli through the song “Obuk Celleng” which without permission composed the lyrics, notation, chords, and arrangements. The Panel of Judges overturned the first instance court’s decision, granted Rahman Efendi’s appeal, ordered the revocation of the registration of the song “Obuk Celleng”, and determined the payment of material and immaterial compensation. However, there is potential for legal friction in the judge’s considerations that do not delve into the substance of the violation and focus more on the letter of registration of the creation.
Agree to Disagree: Understanding the Failure of Mediation Facilitated by Paralegals Yuli Prasetyo Adhi; Triyono Triyono; Dewi Sulistianingsih; Rahmawati Mohd Yusoff
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April, 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v7i2.35020

Abstract

Mediation is widely recognized as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that emphasizes consensus and mutually beneficial outcomes. However, mediation does not always result in a settlement agreement. This article examines the factors contributing to mediation failure, particularly in cases facilitated by paralegals. Using socio-legal research combined with qualitative analysis of mediation practices at the International Mediation and Arbitration Center (IMAC), the Indonesian National Arbitration Institute (BANI), the Gunungkidul Regency Government in Yogyakarta, and National Legal Reform Agency (BPHN), this study analyzes the role of paralegals, the dynamics of the disputing parties, and the procedural challenges that lead to deadlock during mediation. The research findings indicate that several factors, including a lack of good faith on the part of the parties, unrealistic expectations, communication barriers, power imbalances, and limited mediator competence, influence mediation failure. This study argues that mediation should not be considered a failure when no agreement is reached, as the process can still provide clarity for the parties and guide them towards alternative legal pathways. This research contributes to the dispute resolution discourse by highlighting the practical challenges faced by paralegals in the mediation process.