Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Innovative and Creativity
Monica Dewi
University of Kahuripan Kediri
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparison Of BIM And CAD Efficiency In The Planning Phase: A Case Study Of The Construction At PT. Sinar Meadow International Indonesia, Jakarta Ashar Herrianto; Monica Dewi; Inge Anggitasari; Susilowati Susilowati
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i2.3032

Abstract

The rapid development of BIM and CAD greatly influences the world of architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) today, both in the project planning phase, project implementation phase, operational phase, and until demolish. This makes favorite software such as revit and autocad the standard for practitioners and scientists in the AEC world. This study aims to determine the efficiency and effectiveness of using BIM revit and CAD autocad in planning development projects at PT. Sinar Meadow International Indonesia. Such as design speed, clash detection effectiveness, and efficiency and effectiveness in quantity takeoff. This study uses an experimental observation method with analysis of variance. is a test designed to find the relationship between the two variables comparing between research samples. The research instrument is used in collecting primary data between CAD autocad observations and BIM revit.The results of the analysis of the structural, architectural, and mechanical electrical planning drawing experiments explain that the design using BIM revit is 31% faster than using CAD autocad. While in clash detection, revit with interference check tools found 44 cases compared to 3 cases of manual autocad. For quantity take off work, Revit software uses schedule/quantities tools 260% faster than using conventional with AutoCAD software and AutoCAD is 4% cheaper than Revit software..
Co-Authors Ashar Herrianto Inge Anggitasari Susilowati Susilowati