Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature
Hilyati Fitria Harahap
Unknown Affiliation
Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
EFL Students’ Perceptions and Challenges in Using Paperpal as an AI Feedback Tool for Research Paper Writing Hilyati Fitria Harahap; Rahmah Fithriani; Utami Dewi
IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Lite
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/ideas.v14i1.9394

Abstract

This study investigates undergraduate EFL students’ perceptions and challenges in using Paperpal as an AI feedback tool for research paper writing. Although AI-assisted writing tools are increasingly integrated into higher education, empirical research examining students’ experiences with AI-generated feedback in research-oriented writing remains limited, particularly in EFL contexts. Employing a qualitative case study design, this study involved 25 undergraduate English Education students at a state university in Indonesia. Data were collected through a descriptive questionnaire administered to all participants and semi-structured interviews with 10 selected students. Questionnaire data were analyzed using Likert-scale frequency analysis, while interview data were examined through thematic analysis. The findings indicate that students generally perceived Paperpal as a useful and accessible tool that supported grammatical accuracy, sentence clarity, academic vocabulary development, revision efficiency, and confidence during the research paper revision process. However, the study also reveals notable challenges. Students reported difficulty maintaining intended meaning and authorial control when applying AI-generated feedback, particularly in complex argumentative sections. In addition, a tendency toward over-reliance on AI feedback was identified, especially among less confident writers, which occasionally reduced critical evaluation of revisions. Overall, the study concludes that Paperpal functions most effectively as a complementary linguistic support rather than a standalone solution. Its pedagogical value depends on students’ feedback literacy and their ability to engage critically with AI-generated feedback, underscoring the need for guided and responsible integration of AI tools in EFL academic writing instruction.
Co-Authors Rahmah Fithriani Utami Dewi