Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sanjiwani: Jurnal Filsafat Modern Islamic Studies and Sharia Research
Ray, Ibrahim Hasan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
A Critical Analysis of Amina Wadud’s Feminist Hermeneutics in Qur’anic Interpretation Ray, Ibrahim Hasan
Modern Islamic Studies and Sharia Research Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Pascasarjana UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/missr.v1i2.10355

Abstract

This study examines Amina Wadud's feminist hermeneutics method in reading the Qur'an, focusing on her efforts to interpret the text with an awareness of the social context and experiences of women as subjects of interpretation. The research gap that this study aims to fill is the lack of studies in Indonesia that systematically analyze the methodological framework and ethical foundations of tawhid in Wadud's feminist hermeneutics, as most previous studies have been descriptive in nature and have not critically linked the methodological, ethical, and implicative dimensions of feminist readings of the Quran. This article positions itself to go beyond a general presentation of Wadud's thinking by offering a conceptual analysis that highlights how Wadud "stands at the edge of the text," integrates the principle of tawhid as the foundation of gender justice, and unravels the challenges and resistance faced by this approach in contemporary interpretive discourse. The research approach uses qualitative methods through library research with conceptual analysis of relevant literature. The results show that Wadud reconstructs inclusive and gender-just interpretation through dialogue between text and context, affirming tawhid as the basis for rejecting discrimination, while criticizing dominant patriarchal interpretations. In conclusion, these results are in line with the research objective of emphasizing the importance of tawhid-based feminist hermeneutics as an ethical-methodological foundation for gender-just interpretation of the Quran and opening up space for more empirical follow-up research.
EPISTEME PLATO DAN ARISTOTELES: ANALISIS KOMPARATIF IDEALISME DIALEKTIS VERSUS SILOGISME EMPIRIS DALAM FILSAFAT ILMU Ray, Ibrahim Hasan
Sanjiwani: Jurnal Filsafat Vol 17 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article offers a comparative analysis of the concept of episteme in the thought of Plato and Aristotle, aiming to reveal each method's contributions to the development of scientific knowledge, clarifying their roles in formulating and testing scientific truth, and exploring implications for contemporary knowledge advancement. Employing a qualitative-interpretative approach through textual and comparative analysis of Plato's Socratic dialogues and Aristotle's logical works, the study highlights Plato's reflective-transcendental dialectical idealism against Aristotle's systematic-deductive empirical syllogism. Key findings demonstrate their foundational ontological-epistemological differences: Plato grounded in the eternal World of Ideas, Aristotle in concrete hylomorphic reality, giving rise to two scientific paradigms: reflective-normative (mathematics, ethics) versus empirical-descriptive (natural and social sciences). These approaches complement each other in shaping a holistic contemporary scientific paradigm that integrates philosophical and empirical dimensions. In conclusion, the article asserts that idealism and syllogism are mutually reinforcing methods for cultivating critical, systematic, and reflective reasoning in scientific inquiry, with their synergy essential for developing a more comprehensive knowledge framework in the modern era, particularly in bridging philosophical and empirical pursuits of scientific truth.
Co-Authors