Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin
Gunanto, Muhammad Adhistiya Wahidakbar
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi yang Timbul dari Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan oleh Koperasi Gunanto, Muhammad Adhistiya Wahidakbar; Santoso, Budi
Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin (Februari - Maret 2026)
Publisher : Green Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jim.v4i6.1857

Abstract

Jaminan kredit merupakan salah satu bentuk pengamanan piutang yang digunakan koperasi dalam kegiatan pembiayaan kepada anggotanya. Dalam pelaksanaannya, tidak jarang debitur melakukan wanprestasi sehingga menimbulkan akibat hukum bagi para pihak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji akibat hukum wanprestasi yang timbul dari perjanjian kredit dengan jaminan Hak Tanggungan oleh koperasi serta upaya penyelesaian yang dapat dilakukan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, melalui kajian terhadap Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan, serta peraturan terkait perkoperasian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa wanprestasi debitur memberikan hak kepada koperasi sebagai kreditur untuk menuntut pemenuhan prestasi, ganti rugi, pembatalan perjanjian, dan melakukan eksekusi atas objek Hak Tanggungan. Pelaksanaan eksekusi harus tetap memperhatikan asas kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan prinsip kehati-hatian.
IDENTIFIKASI PERMASALAHAN PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI GROBOGAN Gunanto, Muhammad Adhistiya Wahidakbar
Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan Vol 12, No 3 (2023): DESEMBER
Publisher : Criminal Law Section Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/recidive.v12i3.72114

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the settlement of cases with the principle of justice regarding restorative approaches and the implementation of the resulting agreement at each level of examination. As long as the restorative justice process takes place and after restorative justice is carried out, social counselors are required to provide guidance and supervision. Restorative justice is not carried out within the time specified in the agreement. This involves a process in which all parties at risk of a particular crime jointly try to collectively resolve how to deal with the aftermath of a crime and its implications in the future. The restorative justice policy in cases that occur at the Grobogan district attorney's office which acts in accordance with the role of law enforcement officials, especially the prosecutor's office which is part of the criminal justice subsystem, is obliged to seek settlement by prosecutor who handle all cases. The perspective of restorative justice from the aspect of judicial administration is to reduce the accumulation of cases. However, it can be stated the urgency of the need to settle minor criminal cases when viewed from a restorative justice perspective, because society dominates the development of the legal system. based on the concept of restorative justice Restorative justice does not only discuss who wins and who loses which can trigger hostility/resistance (adversarial system), the restorative justice process emphasizes a dialogue facility between all parties affected by crime including victims, perpetrators, supporters, and society as a whole. 
Co-Authors Dwi Budi Santoso