Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Comprehensive Systematic Review of The Relationship between Poverty Status and Access to Tuberculosis Treatment in Developing Countries Harlina Hi M Konoras; Muhammad Irsan; Brian Enrique Fritzgerald
The Indonesian Journal of General Medicine Vol. 27 No. 1 (2026): The Indonesian Journal of General Medicine
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/cd0wy377

Abstract

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health challenge, disproportionately affecting populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Poverty is a fundamental social determinant that intersects with and exacerbates barriers to TB care, from diagnosis through treatment completion. Understanding the multifaceted relationship between poverty status and access to TB treatment is critical for designing equitable and effective interventions to end the TB epidemic (Teo et al., 2020; Tanimura et al., 2014). Methods: This comprehensive systematic review synthesized evidence from 80 studies examining the relationship between poverty and TB treatment access in developing countries. A rigorous screening process was employed, focusing on studies with TB patients in LMICs that quantitatively assessed economic factors as exposures and treatment access as an outcome. Data extraction followed a structured protocol covering study context, poverty definitions, treatment access measures, financial and non-financial barriers, treatment outcomes, and tested interventions. Results: The evidence consistently demonstrates a strong negative association between poverty and TB treatment access. A significant proportion of TB patients face catastrophic health expenditures, with rates reaching 43% overall, 80% for drug-resistant TB, and 81% for HIV-coinfected patients (Ghazy et al., 2022; Ghazy et al., 2021). Indirect costs, primarily income loss, constitute approximately 60% of the total financial burden. Non-financial barriers, including geographic distance, stigma, and structural healthcare system limitations, further impede access. Poverty is associated with longer diagnosis and treatment delays, with patient delays averaging 28 days in low-income countries compared to 10 days in upper-middle-income countries (Teo et al., 2021). Effective interventions include cash transfers (OR 1.77 for positive clinical outcomes), food support, decentralized diagnostics, and community-based care models (Richterman et al., 2018; Filho, 2009; Assebe et al., 2025). Discussion: The relationship between poverty and TB treatment access is complex and mediated through multiple pathways. The heterogeneity in findings can be explained by contextual factors such as national economic development, drug resistance status, and case-finding strategies. The dominance of indirect costs highlights the insufficiency of policies focusing solely on eliminating direct medical fees. Multi-component, pro-poor interventions that address financial, geographic, and social barriers simultaneously show the greatest promise for improving equity in TB care. Conclusion: Poverty is a powerful driver of inequitable access to TB treatment in developing countries, leading to catastrophic costs, treatment delays, and poorer outcomes. To achieve global TB targets, programs must move beyond medical-focused models and integrate comprehensive social protection, poverty-sensitive service delivery innovations, and active case-finding strategies tailored to the needs of the most vulnerable populations. Future research should employ standardized poverty measurements and robust designs to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of integrated, pro-poor TB interventions.
A Comprehensive Systematic Review of The Relationship between Breathing Exercises (Yoga / Pranayama) and Lung Function in Asthma Patients Harlina Hi M Konoras; Muhammad Irsan; Brian Enrique Fritzgerald
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 28 No. 2 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/af09gs20

Abstract

Introduction: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease characterized by variable airflow obstruction, affecting millions worldwide. Despite pharmacological advances, many patients experience suboptimal control and seek complementary therapies. Breathing exercises, including yoga and pranayama, have been widely advocated as adjunctive interventions to improve respiratory mechanics and lung function in asthma (Santino et al., 2020). This systematic review comprehensively examines the relationship between structured breathing exercises and objective lung function parameters in asthma patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following a detailed screening protocol. Studies were included if they involved ≥80% asthma patients or provided subgroup analysis, examined yoga/pranayama/structured breathing techniques, measured objective lung function (e.g., FEV1, FVC, PEFR), employed controlled study designs (RCTs, quasi-experimental, cohort, case-control, systematic reviews), included a comparison group, and had an intervention duration of at least one week. Data extraction covered intervention details, lung function assessments, study design, population characteristics, outcomes, and contextual factors from 80 included sources. Results: The evidence reveals heterogeneous findings. Meta-analyses showed conflicting results; for example, Yang et al. (2016) found no significant effect on FEV1 (MD 0.04 L, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.19), while Rathore et al. (2025) reported a significant improvement (WMD 0.47 L, p<0.00001). PEFR demonstrated the most consistent improvements across studies (e.g., Cramer et al., 2014: SMD 0.49, p<0.001). Pranayama and Buteyko techniques showed comparable efficacy, with some evidence favoring Buteyko for certain spirometric parameters (Swathi et al., 2021; Elsaid et al., 2023). Improvements were more pronounced with supervised, frequent (daily), and longer-duration (≥8 weeks) interventions, particularly in adult mild-to-moderate asthma populations. Discussion: The heterogeneity in outcomes can be attributed to variations in study quality, intervention type, duration, intensity, population characteristics, and cultural context. High-quality RCTs often reported more modest lung function benefits alongside significant improvements in symptoms and quality of life. The primary mechanism likely involves enhanced respiratory muscle efficiency, improved breathing pattern control, and potential modulation of autonomic and inflammatory pathways, rather than fundamental reversal of airway obstruction. Conclusion: Breathing exercises, particularly yoga and pranayama, can serve as beneficial adjunctive therapy for asthma, primarily improving PEFR and potentially FEV1 with sustained practice. They are most effective for adults with mild-to-moderate asthma when practiced regularly under guidance. Future research should prioritize high-quality, large-scale RCTs with standardized protocols, longer follow-up, and exploration of mechanisms and cost-effectiveness to solidify clinical recommendations.