Agyei, Charles Amoah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Contextualizing Genetics: A Meta-Analysis of Academic Achievement through Context-Based Teaching Agyei, Charles Amoah; Gyamfi, Maxwell
Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy
Publisher : Scientia Publica Media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70232/jrep.v3i1.110

Abstract

This meta-analysis investigates the effectiveness of context-based teaching approaches on students’ academic achievement in genetics, a subject often perceived by learners as abstract and cognitively challenging. Traditional instruction in genetics tends to emphasize memorization over meaningful understanding, contributing to widespread disengagement and underperformance. In response, educational reform efforts have increasingly promoted context-based teaching, which situates learning within real-world scenarios to improve relevance, comprehension, and learner motivation. The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of context-based instruction on academic achievement in genetics by synthesizing data from 69 master’s and doctoral theses conducted between 2010 and 2022. These studies were selected based on stringent inclusion criteria: use of experimental or quasi-experimental designs, focus on genetics education, availability of relevant statistical data, and application of context-based instructional strategies. A total sample of 4,790 students was analyzed, 2,476 in experimental groups and 2,314 in control groups. Effect sizes were calculated using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software, applying both fixed-effect and random-effect models. The results demonstrated large and statistically significant positive effects of context-based instruction on student achievement in genetics (FEM d = 0.789; REM d = 1.064), with substantial heterogeneity observed across studies. These findings underscore the pedagogical value of integrating real-life contexts into genetics education. The study concludes that context-based instruction significantly enhances students’ understanding and performance in genetics. It highlights the need for teacher training, curriculum reform, and instructional design that aligns with constructivist principles. While limitations exist, such as the exclusive reliance on theses and language restrictions, the study provides a strong foundation for future research and evidence-based policy in science education.
Instructional Design and Students’ Performance: The Role of the ASSURE Model in Teaching Genetics Kasim, Salifu; Agyei, Charles Amoah; Maxwell, Gyamfi
Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy
Publisher : Scientia Publica Media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70232/jrep.v3i2.140

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of the ASSURE instructional design model on the academic performance of Senior High School (SHS) students in genetics concepts in Ghana. The research was prompted by persistent conceptual challenges faced by biology students in genetics, as documented in prior studies and WAEC Chief Examiners’ Reports. These challenges often result in poor academic outcomes, particularly in topics such as DNA, chromosomes, inheritance, and variation. To address this issue, the study employed a quasi-experimental design using a pre-test/post-test non-equivalent control group. A total of 104 SHS 3 Biology students from four intact classes in the Bawku, Pusiga, and Garu Districts of the Upper East Region were randomly assigned to either an experimental group taught using the ASSURE model or a control group taught using traditional methods. The Genetics Concept Test (GCT), developed by the researchers, was used to assess students’ understanding before and after the intervention. Pre-test results showed the control group outperforming the experimental group. However, post-test analysis using ANCOVA revealed a statistically significant improvement in the experimental group’s performance (M = 23.938, SE = 0.279) compared to the control group (M = 19.483, SE = 0.268; F (1,101) = 121.251, p =.001), with a large effect size (Partial Eta Squared = 0.546). Furthermore, no significant gender differences were found in the experimental group’s post-test scores, suggesting that the ASSURE model supports equitable learning outcomes. The study concludes that the ASSURE instructional design model enhances students’ academic performance in genetics and is gender-sensitive. It recommends its integration into biology instruction to improve conceptual understanding and performance, especially in regions with historically low achievement in genetics.