Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

An Election Monitoring Model in Indonesia Based on the Maqâsid Al-Syarî'ah Perspective: An Analysis of the Jâsir 'Audah Theory M. Reza Saputra
Siyasah Dusturiyah: State Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Siyasah Dusturiyah: State Law Review
Publisher : Yayasan Cahaya Generasi Positif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/p9cye235

Abstract

This research analyses the election supervision model in Indonesia based on the perspective of maqâsid al-syarî'ah Jâsir 'Audah, focusing on protecting the five fundamental values in the electoral system. Implementing the 2024 General Election presents complex structural challenges, especially protecting KPPS officers with 181 recorded deaths. Using descriptive qualitative methods with a juridical-normative approach, this research examines Law no. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections and integrates it with the theory of the Jâsir 'Audah system. The research results identified three main challenges: weak mechanisms for continuous health monitoring, unclear responsibilities of relevant agencies, and minimal community participation in monitoring the welfare of officers. The integration of maqâsid al-syarî'ah principles offers a holistic framework to strengthen the supervision system through the protection of hifdz al-nafs (soul), hifdz al-'aql (reason), hifdz al-nasl (offspring), and hifdz al-mâl (treasure). Policy recommendations include strengthening specific regulations, developing IoT-based technology for monitoring working conditions, and establishing rapid response protocols for vulnerable groups. This research concludes that the maqâsid system approach can answer the complexity of modern election challenges and strengthen the accountability of the Indonesian electoral system.
Towards 13 Years of Compulsory Education: Strategies for Equitable Access to Quality Education in Indonesia M. Reza Saputra; Nabila Hilyatunisa
Journal of Smart Pedagogy and Education Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Smart Pedagogy and Education
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/spedu.v1i1.21

Abstract

The transition to a thirteen-year compulsory education system in Indonesia presents a critical opportunity to strengthen academic learning outcomes and promote inclusive, high-quality education. Despite high primary enrollment rates, significant retention gaps emerge at junior and senior secondary levels, particularly in rural and 3T (frontier, outermost, and disadvantaged) regions. This study aims to identify the key barriers to academic progression and propose evidence-based strategies to enhance educational equity and quality across diverse socioeconomic contexts. Employing a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature, analyzed national and provincial enrollment and completion statistics, and carried out case studies in representative 3T districts to assess infrastructure, teacher capacity, and learner support mechanisms. Our findings reveal that disparities in school facilities, teacher qualifications, and digital infrastructure critically undermine academic achievement, while early childhood education (PAUD) expansion and the Merdeka Belajar reform offer promising pedagogical and policy frameworks. We further demonstrate that targeted resource allocations, comprehensive teacher professional development, and community-engaged governance models significantly improve student retention and performance. The synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence informs a set of actionable recommendations, including scalable PAUD integration, adaptive curriculum design, and sustainable funding mechanisms aligned with demographic dividend objectives. These insights provide a roadmap for policymakers and educators to implement a thirteen-year compulsory education system that not only extends academic access but also elevates learning quality and lifelong competencies.
Empowerment of Basic and Digital Literacy for Enhancing Socio-Economic Capacity in Sukoharum Village: Pemberdayaan Literasi Dasar dan Digital untuk Peningkatan Kapasitas Sosio-Ekonomi di Desa Sukoharum M. Reza Saputra; Nabila Hilyatunisa
Jurnal Pengabdian Cita Masyarakat Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian Cita Masyarakat
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/jpcm.v1i1.43

Abstract

This community service research focuses on addressing the dual literacy gap basic and digital through an integrated intervention in Sukoharum Village, Adiluwih Subdistrict, Pringsewu Regency, Lampung. Despite possessing significant socio-economic potential, the village faces limited access to formal education and digital skills. The Community Service Program (KKN) was conducted from August 1–31, 2025, employing the Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach through stages of social mapping, participatory planning, implementation, and mentoring. Core activities included the establishment of a “Reading Corner” for children, Microsoft Word training, and digital marketing outreach for youth and Islamic boarding school students. Evaluation was carried out using quantitative participation data and qualitative observations of behavioral changes. The findings indicate enhanced reading interest among children, improved document processing skills among youth, and a greater understanding of local product marketing strategies through social media. The synergy of basic and digital literacy has shaped a sustainable empowerment model, reinforcing human resource capacity as the foundation for the village’s socio-economic development.
Public Ethics and the Legitimacy of Indonesian Democracy: Protests over DPR Allowances, Elite Conflict, and Civil Response: Etika Publik dan Legitimasi Demokrasi Indonesia: Protes Tunjangan DPR, Konflik Elite, dan Respons Sipil M. Reza Saputra
Journal of State Democracy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Journal of State Democracy 
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/jsd.v1i1.36

Abstract

This study examines the August 2025 controversy over parliamentary allowances in Indonesia as a critical case of public ethics failure and its impact on democratic legitimacy. By applying a qualitative case‐study approach and critical discourse analysis of primary news sources and academic literature, the research investigates elite rhetoric and actions that revealed profound disconnects from citizen realities. It further explores how digitally mediated civil responses transformed latent frustration into coordinated mass protests, amplifying challenges to institutional trust. The analysis situates these events within structural weaknesses of Indonesia’s “fat coalition” system, demonstrating how the absence of effective legislative opposition fosters elite impunity and ethical erosion. Findings highlight the causal sequence from coalition dynamics to oversight failure, elite misconduct, civic mobilization, and legitimacy crisis. The study concludes that without fundamental reforms to strengthen checks and balances particularly a functional legislative opposition Indonesia’s democracy remains vulnerable to recurring cycles of elite impunity and public distrust.
Designing Institutional Framework for Political Parties in Indonesia: Democratic Analysis and Party Autonomy M. Reza Saputra; Taufiqurrohman Syahuri; Ahmad Ahsin Thohari
Journal of State Democracy Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Journal of State Democracy
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/jsd.v1i2.180

Abstract

This study examines the institutional design of political parties in Indonesia post-Reformation, which is hindered by state intervention through mandatory legal entity status under Law Number 2 of 2011. Utilizing normative legal research and comparative legal analysis with Germany, Sweden, and the UK, this study analyzes how the administrative authority of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights is frequently misused to intervene in internal party disputes, thereby undermining party autonomy. Findings indicate that the current legal entity regime functions as an instrument of executive political control rather than neutral administration, contradicting the principle of legal certainty. This research recommends a five-pillar institutional model, including: separating legal entity status from electoral participation requirements, establishing the General Elections Commission (KPU) as the sole neutral entry point for registration, transferring dispute resolution to independent courts, internal democratization via term limits, and strengthening financial transparency. These reforms aim to restore party independence as an accountable democratic pillar, free from oligarchy and state manipulation.