Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Deep Learning Architectures for Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction: A State‑of‑the‑Art Review of CNN, ANN, and Hybrid Models M. Adil Khan; Imran Ali Channa; Saad Hanif; Baitullah Khan Kibzai
Journal of ICT, Design, Engineering and Technological Science Volume 9, Issue 1
Publisher : Journal of ICT, Design, Engineering and Technological Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33150/JITDETS-9.1.7

Abstract

Structural safety, optimization of materials, and sustainable construction practice depend on the prediction of concrete compressive strength. Traditional methods of testing use the laboratory method, which is time‑consuming, expensive, and destructive. Recent progress in deep learning has made it possible to predict the compressive strength in an accurate, rapid, and non‑destructive way by modeling nonlinear complex relationships between the constituents of concrete, curing conditions, and mechanical performance. This review is a systematic review of the deep learning architectures that have been applied to predict the concrete compressive strength with state‑of‑the‑art, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Artiϐicial Neural Networks (ANNs), Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), Long Short‑Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), Transformer‑based models, and hybrid architectures (CNN‑LSTM, CNN‑GRU, and ensemble stacking). It has been shown in the literature that higher hybrid and ensemble models allow the high predictive performance to be achieved, with the value of R² often exceeding 0.95, with the best possible models having an R² of 0.99 when using controlled datasets. Both metaheuristic optimization algorithms (e.g., PSO, GA, ACO, TLBO) and Bayesian hyperparameter tuning would greatly increase the model generalization and robustness. Moreover, interpretable artificial intelligence tools, such as SHAP and sensitivity analysis, have enhanced interpretability, and cement content, curing age, and water‑cement ratio are confirmed to be the most significant predictors of strength. Applications have been spread over the spe‑ cialized materials like ultra‑high‑performance concrete (UHPC), geopolymer concrete, recycled aggregate concrete, self‑compacting concrete, and waste‑based sustainable concretes. However, the issues of data standardization, cross‑laboratory generalization, and model transparency persist in spite of impressive advances. The future research is to be directed at physics‑informed neural networks, the multi‑objective optimization that considers the metrics of environmental impact, real‑time edge deployment, and the standardized benchmark datasets. In general, methods using deep learning as its core technology can be discussed as a revolutionary development in intelligent concrete design and sustainable construction engineering
Sustainable Concrete Mixture Design for Reducing Embodied CO₂: A Comprehensive Data‑Driven Assessment of Material Composition, Environmental Indicators, and Predictive Modeling for Low‑Carbon Construction Applications M. Adil Khan; Asad Ullah Khan; Saad Hanif; Syed Zamin Raza Naqvi
Journal of ICT, Design, Engineering and Technological Science Volume 9, Issue 2
Publisher : Journal of ICT, Design, Engineering and Technological Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33150/JITDETS-9.2.4

Abstract

Minimising embodied CO2 in concrete is one of the most important tasks that needs to be performed in order to attain a sustain‑able construction and prevent the effects of the changes in climatic conditions. This paper is a comparative analysis of three machine learning models: Linear Regression (LR), AdaBoost (ADB), and K‑Nearest Neighbours (KNN) to predict embodied_CO2 based on a dataset of 1,000 ob‑servations in the form of mixture composition, material properties, and environmental indicators. The descriptive statistical analysis assured the balanced distribution of most variables with little skewness, whereas the correlation analysis revealed cement and resource consumption as the leading factors contributing to embodied_CO2. Training, testing, split, and k‑fold cross‑validation based on the R, MAE, RMSE, RAE, and RRSE metrics were used to measure the model performance. Findings reveal that KNN was a better method in comparison with LR and ADB in all assessment systems. KNN with k‑fold validation had a correlation coefficient of 0.9996, MAE of 1.8668, and RMSE of 2.5041 versus LR (R = 0.9874, MAE = 11.3218, RMSE = 13.0931) and ADB (R = 0.9764, MAE = 14.5647, RMSE = 18.0974). The same tendencies were noted in the testing stage, with KNN having R = 0.9996, MAE = 1.9273, and RMSE = 2.7044, which are considerably lower than LR (MAE = 11.0947; RMSE = 12.8293) and ADB (MAE = 13.9921; RMSE = 16.8487). The residual analysis also indicated that KNN has better stability, with tightly clustered and symmetric error distributions and a small generalisation gap. The results show that instance‑based learning is effective to learn complex nonlinear associations in embodied carbon prediction. This paper emphasizes the significance of strong cross‑validation and residual diagnos‑tics in model selection and shows the feasibility of machine learning in aiding the design of low‑carbon concrete with regard to design strategies.