Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of the Implementation of the Integrated Industrial Area Development Policy for Tukak Sadai Port in South Bangka Regency, Bangka Belitung Islands Province. Muhammad Afdhal Abdiansyah; Dea Melati; Muhamad Anang Munawir
Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 23 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Pengurus Pusat Perkumpulan Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara Indonesia (PIANI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63309/dialektika.v23i3.971

Abstract

South Bangka Regency sits near Indonesia’s Archipelagic Sea Lane (ALKI 1), giving Tukak Sadai Port the potential to anchor a port-based integrated industrial zone and stimulate local competitiveness. Yet a policy gap across central, provincial, and district levels has raised concerns about whether the program is being implemented effectively. This study aims to explain why implementation of the Tukak Sadai Port Integrated Industrial Area (KIT) remains suboptimal, using Grindle’s policy implementation framework (policy content and implementation context) as the main analytical lens. A qualitative descriptive design was employed, drawing on interviews, field notes, and official documents, and analyzing data by matching empirical patterns with the theoretical indicators. Findings show that implementation has progressed and produced local multiplier effects (infrastructure expansion, MSME development, commodity absorption, and job creation), and the project has entered Phase II aligned with the spatial plan (RTRW). However, coordination among regional apparatus organizations and partners is uneven, several supporting studies have not been completed, and governance arrangements with the area manager (PT RBA) require clearer oversight and evaluation. The study recommends establishing a Bappeda-led coordination team and issuing district-level regulations to strengthen legal certainty, accountability, and inter-agency synchronization. 
Transformational Leadership in Modern Government in Indonesia Dea Melati; Ganden Syariep Saputra; Muhammad Afdhal Abdiansyah
Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 23 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Pengurus Pusat Perkumpulan Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara Indonesia (PIANI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63309/dialektika.v23i3.972

Abstract

This study examines the role of transformational leadership in strengthening modern governance and encouraging innovation in public services. The urgency of this study arises from the challenges of contemporary bureaucracy, ranging from the need for bureaucratic reform, service digitalization, to increasing accountability and public trust, which demand a leadership model that can inspire, motivate, and encourage innovation. The objectives of this study are (1) to reconstruct the concept and dimensions of transformational leadership in the context of government; (2) to examine empirical evidence of the application of this leadership style to service innovation and bureaucratic performance; and (3) to formulate policy recommendations for strengthening public leadership capacity. The method used is a literature study (library research) with a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach: searching for journal articles, academic books, and selected policy documents, thematic classification, and analytical synthesis of the four dimensions of transformational leadership. The results of the study indicate that transformational leadership through idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individual attention has the potential to increase service innovation, apparatus commitment, and public accountability when supported by managerial capacity and a supportive organizational climate. This article recommends (a) a training and coaching-based transformational leadership development program for public officials; (b) strengthening dynamic managerial capacity at the middle level to accelerate innovation; and (c) a further research agenda that examines implementation mechanisms in various regional contexts.