Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Universitas Jendral Soedirman

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KEABSAHAN JUAL BELI BENDA JAMINAN TIDAK MELALUI LELANG (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 3507 K/PDT/2023) Nanda Rizqiani Saputri; Sulistyandari; Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang Vol. 10 No. 04 (2024): Volume 10 No. 04 Desember 2024
Publisher : STKIP Subang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36989/didaktik.v10i04.5478

Abstract

This research analyzes the validity of the sale and purchase of collateral objects carried out without going through an auction process, as examined in Supreme Court Decision Number 3507 K/Pdt/2023. This study focuses on civil law aspects related to the sale and purchase agreement and its implications for the protection of the rights of creditors, debtors, and third parties involved. This research uses normative legal research methods with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Data sources include primary legal materials, such as court decisions and related regulations, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of relevant legal literature. Data collection techniques were carried out through literature study, and data analysis using descriptive qualitative methods. The results show that the sale and purchase of collateral objects without auction authorized through a deed of sale and purchase is legally flawed and contrary to applicable laws and regulations. Supreme Court Decision Number 3507 K/Pdt/2023 stated that the defendants' actions, which included making a sale and purchase deed without the knowledge of the owner of the collateral object, were unlawful. The decision overturned a previous court decision that declared the sale and purchase deed valid. The differences in legal considerations between the District Court, High Court, and Supreme Court reflect the importance of consistent enforcement of legal procedures in the sale and purchase of collateral. This research confirms that the implementation of auction as a formal mechanism for the execution of collateral is very important to ensure legal certainty and protect the rights of all interested parties. The practical implication of this finding is the need to strengthen supervision of collateral execution to prevent violations that can harm debtors and disrupt legal stability in the field of property security.
Perselingkuhan Sebagai Delik Kesusilaan Dalam KUHP Baru: Analisis Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum Dan Efektifitas Penegakan Hukumnya Di Indonesia Nabila Dyahayu Maharani; Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Science and Education Journal (SICEDU) Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Science and Education Journal 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/sicedu.v5i2.714

Abstract

Perselingkuhan merupakan fenomena sosial yang tidak hanya berkaitan dengan pelanggaran moral, tetapi juga berpotensi menimbulkan konflik keluarga, gangguan ketertiban sosial, hingga tindak pidana lain yang lebih serius. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan perselingkuhan sebagai delik kesusilaan dalam Pasal 411 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP Baru) ditinjau dari perspektif sosiologi hukum serta mengkaji efektivitas penegakan hukumnya di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan sosiologi hukum melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 411 KUHP Baru mencerminkan perluasan kriminalisasi dari ranah privat menuju perlindungan moralitas publik dan institusi keluarga. Namun, efektivitas penerapannya masih menghadapi berbagai hambatan, seperti sifat delik aduan, rendahnya keberanian korban untuk melapor, pluralitas nilai sosial masyarakat, serta potensi overkriminalisasi dan diskriminasi dalam penegakan hukum. Selain itu, terdapat kesenjangan antara hukum tertulis (law in the books) dan hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat (living law), sehingga tujuan perlindungan kesusilaan belum sepenuhnya tercapai. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pendekatan yang tidak hanya bersifat penal, tetapi juga preventif, edukatif, dan restoratif guna mewujudkan perlindungan korban serta ketertiban sosial yang lebih efektif.