Asmat Burhan
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Prevalence, Severity (ISTAP Classification), and Risk Factors of Skin Tears in Long-Term Care Residents: A Multi-Facility Cross-Sectional Study Anna Lindström; Eriksson Johan; Karin Svensson; Michael O’Neill; Asmat Burhan
Journal of Wound Research and Technology Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June - October 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Science Media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70196/jwrt.v2i2.66

Abstract

Background: Skin tears remain a substantial, preventable harm in long-term geriatric care, yet exposure-aware benchmarks are scarce. Evidence quantifying how medical adhesive type and resident frailty relate to point prevalence and ISTAP severity in routine care is limited, hindering targeted prevention and procurement policies. Purposes: This study aimed to estimate skin-tear prevalence and severity, and to test associations of adhesive type and resident factors with these outcomes among older inpatients. Methods: In a cross-sectional study at Skånes universitetssjukhus, Malmö, Sweden (4 September–30 November 2024), we enrolled 243 adults aged >65 years meeting prespecified eligibility. Skin tears and ISTAP Types 1–3 were assessed by trained staff; adhesive exposure (acrylic vs silicone) and covariates (age, sex, CFS frailty, dermatoporosis, xerosis, comorbidities, cognition, prior tears, environment) were recorded. The primary outcomes were point prevalence and ordinal severity. We applied modified Poisson models for prevalence ratios and ordinal logistic regression for severity, adjusting for prespecified covariates, reporting effect estimates with 95% CIs. Sensitivity, subgroup, and interaction analyses were prespecified. Results: Among 243 residents (mean age 79.8; 58% women), point prevalence was 18.1%. Acrylic (vs silicone) adhesive was associated with higher prevalence (aPR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06–2.18) and greater ISTAP severity; frailty (per CFS point aPR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01–1.38), dermatoporosis (aPR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03–1.77), xerosis (aPR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03–2.03), and prior tears (aPR 1.62, 95% CI 1.09–2.41) were independent correlates. The acrylic effect was stronger at CFS ≥5 (interaction p=0.031). Findings were robust across sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Selecting soft silicone adhesives and prioritising barrier care for frail, dermatoporotic residents may reduce skin-tear burden. Results support practice and procurement policies in geriatric/LTC wards and motivate multicentre longitudinal or pragmatic cluster-RCTs to assess durability and cost-effectiveness.
Nutritional Risk, Frailty, and Inflammatory Biomarkers as Correlates of Infection Severity and Healing Risk in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study Samsul Adipati; Akbar Faruk; Asmat Burhan
Journal of Wound Research and Technology Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): November - May 2026
Publisher : Indonesian Science Media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70196/jwrt.v3i1.88

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) remain a major clinical problem because severe infection and poor healing increase hospitalization, amputation, and mortality. Patient-level factors such as nutritional vulnerability, frailty, and inflammatory burden may be clinically relevant, but integrated hospital-based evidence remains limited, particularly in Indonesian wound-care settings. Aim: To examine whether nutritional risk, frailty, and inflammatory biomarkers were associated with infection severity and healing risk in hospitalized patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Approach: This hospital-based cross-sectional study included 91 adults with active diabetic foot ulcers at General Hospital Bhakti Rahayu. Consecutive sampling was used. Eligible participants had diabetes, an active ulcer, and complete clinical and laboratory data. Ordinal and binary logistic regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 19 Results: The mean (SD) age was 58.6 (10.9) years, 62.6% were male, 73.6% had nutritional risk, and 41.8% were frail. Infection severity was mild in 31.9%, moderate in 47.3%, and severe in 20.9%. Higher infection severity was associated with nutritional risk (aOR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.05-9.67; P = .04), frailty (aOR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.01-4.98; P = .048), and higher CRP per 10-mg/L increase (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.05-1.42; P = .01) Conclusions: Nutritional risk, frailty, and inflammatory burden were associated with greater infection severity in hospitalized patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Implication for Nursing Practice: Nursing assessment of diabetic foot ulcers may benefit from integrating nutritional screening, frailty evaluation, and inflammatory biomarker review to support earlier risk identification and more individualized wound-care planning.