Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE DALAM PENGUATAN KEBIJAKAN PROTEKSI LINGKUNGAN HIDUP MENUJU SMART REGENCY DI KABUPATEN GRESIK Yendra Erison; Alif Firdaus Zamzam; Ahmad Afandi; Suci Indah Sari
Journal Publicuho Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): November - January - Journal Publicuho
Publisher : Halu Oleo University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35817/publicuho.v8i4.956

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the collaborative governance model in strengthening environmental protection policies as the foundation for the transformation of Gresik Regency towards a Smart Regency. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, Focus Group Discussions (FGD), and documentation of key actors such as the Environmental Service, PT Petrokimia Gresik, and civil society organisations. The research results show that the implementation of collaborative governance in Gresik has formed a pattern of collaboration involving the government, industry and civil society sectors, although it still faces challenges in the form of inequality of participation and weak deliberative space. Regional governments, through DLH, act as facilitators of adaptive environmental policies, while the industrial sector is starting to adopt a co-design approach in social responsibility programs. Civil society organisations such as Asbag and Pokdarling also encourage participatory public supervision and education. However, the collaboration that occurs is still more procedural than substantive. This research recommends the need to improve the design of environmental governance that is inclusive and transparent, where each actor has an equal position in policy formulation, implementation and evaluation. Only through parallel synergy can the ideals of Gresik as a Smart Regency based on a smart environment be truly realised sustainably.
The Paradox of Democratic Media: Platform Logic and the Failure of Policy Conversion in Indonesia's 17+8 Movement Alif Firdaus Zamzam; Nurul Laili
Madani: Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): MADANI : Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia witnessed an unprecedented wave of nationwide mass mobilization driven by widening disparities between the privileges enjoyed by political elites and the mounting economic pressures faced by lower- and middle-income communities. This mobilization was further amplified by the rapid circulation of digital narratives across social media platforms. This article examines the movement's central paradox: its remarkable capacity to rapidly consolidate cross-class demands was accompanied—not proportionally, but simultaneously—by its inability to translate those demands into binding public policy. This study employs a qualitative literature review approach combined with digital discourse analysis of publicly circulated social media content collected during the escalation of the movement and the subsequent post-deadline monitoring period. The analysis proceeds through three stages: mapping the movement's action-network structure, tracing the declining visibility of campaign hashtags over time, and interpreting the findings through the theoretical framework of paradoxical democracy. The findings demonstrate that the 17+8 Movement represents a prototype of a crowd-enabled action network operating without a formal brokering organization. While this decentralized structure enabled rapid mass mobilization, it also rendered the movement highly vulnerable to digital repression and algorithmic shifts in public attention once the viral momentum subsided. Consequently, the movement's failure to achieve policy conversion should not be interpreted as evidence of the ineffectiveness of digital activism itself. Rather, it reflects a structural failure of policy conversion, arising from a digital ecosystem that remains insufficiently connected to institutional channels capable of transforming civic participation into formal political outcomes before public attention shifts toward competing issues.