Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Muyassar: Journal of Arabic Education Alsinatuna
Talqis Nurdianto
Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Al-Fikr al-Balāgiy fi al-Ma’āniy ‘inda Sakāki fi Kitābihi Miftāḥ al-‘Ulūm (Dirāsah Balāgiyah) Talqis Nurdianto
ALSINATUNA Vol 3 No 1 (2017): December 2017
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/alsinatuna.v3i1.6751

Abstract

Miftāhul ‘Ulūm, written by al-Sakākī, especially the third part, was the beginning of a new phase in the development of Arabic rhetoric. Al-Sakākī divided the rhetoric into three fields of study,which are (1) Ma’ānī, (2) Bayān, (3) Badī’. However, his style is by philosophers, theologians and their verbal lexicon, which are difficult to take, especially for the ordinary recipient. Al-Sakākī described that his book containing several types of literature, namely, ‘ilm ṣarf in complete version and its conclusion,derivation science, and the grammatical study in the completeness of Ma’ānī and Bayān. The meaning of Makna is the study of completeness and conclusion. Therefore, books and prose, and poem require al-‘Arūḍ and al-Qawāfī include Ṣarf, Grammar, Ma’ānī, Bayān, limitation, reasoning, al’Arūḍ, and al-Qawāfī. He argued that the fields of study were influential in delivering knowledge to the student in order to reach the goal of the author towards his book. This research was an analytical descriptive study of al-Sakākī rhetoric that focused on the normative aspect represented by rhetorical rule and aesthetic aspects. Those aspects were shown by the feeling. Al-Sakākī rhetoric thought is a method based on mental division and has conducted in the construction of many factors, which the most important of them are philosophy and logic.
The Rhetorical Representation of Divine Light in Qur'an 24:35: A Comparative Study of Muhammad Abu Musa's Interpretation and ChatGPT Analysis Sugeng Hariyadi; Talqis Nurdianto; Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi
Al-Muyassar: Journal of Arabic Education Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Al-Muyassar: Journal of Arabic Education
Publisher : Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/rsawpt08

Abstract

This study aims to compare the interpretation of the rhetorical simile of Divine Light in the thirty-fifth verse of Sūrat al-Nūr as presented by Muhammad Abū Mūsā, a contemporary scholar of Arabic rhetoric, and the analysis produced by ChatGPT as an artificial intelligence-based system. The study focuses on comparing their approaches to interpreting the contextual relationship of the verse within Sūrat al-Nūr and their analysis of the elements of the compound simile (tashbīh murakkab) based on the principles of ʿilm al-bayān. Employing a descriptive-comparative library research method, this study uses Abū Mūsā’s work on the parables of Sūrat al-Nūr as the primary human analysis source, while the AI-based analysis was generated through ChatGPT 5.5 OpenAi and verified by comparison with relevant academic studies. The comparison was organized around two main aspects: the interpretation of the verse’s context and the structure and rhetorical function of the Divine Light simile. The findings reveal that both analyses agree that Divine Light symbolizes divine guidance and is closely connected to the thematic structure of Sūrat al-Nūr. However, they differ in their approaches to meaning construction. Abū Mūsā’s analysis begins from the broader context and objectives of the surah, particularly by relating the simile to the preceding legal discourse, whereas ChatGPT emphasizes the symbolic, spiritual, and educational dimensions of the rhetorical image. The study concludes that artificial intelligence can serve as a valuable supporting tool for enriching Qur’anic rhetorical studies, but it cannot replace the contextual depth and rhetorical appreciation provided by human scholars. This research contributes to the field of Digital Humanities by examining the potentials and limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) in analyzing Qur’anic rhetoric.
Co-Authors Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi Sugeng Hariyadi