Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Epistemologi Amal dalam Tiga Aliran Teologi Islam: Analisis Komparatif Khowarij, Murji’ah, dan Ahlussunnah Tofan Rinaldi; Benni Prasetya
Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Agama Islam Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Maret: Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Agama Islam
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Pendidikan Agama dan Filsafat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/jmpai.v4i2.1896

Abstract

The debate concerning the relationship between faith (īmān) and deeds (ʿamal) constitutes one of the central issues in the history of Islamic theology, generating diverse perspectives among theological schools. This study aims to comparatively analyze the epistemology of deeds in three classical Islamic theological traditions: Khawarij, Murji’ah, and Ahlussunnah. The research employs a qualitative approach using the integrative literature review method, examining classical works of ʿilm al-kalām alongside contemporary academic studies. The data were analyzed through data reduction, thematic categorization, and comparative analysis to identify differences in the epistemological frameworks used to understand the relationship between faith and deeds. The findings indicate that the Khawarij developed a textual–legalistic epistemology that considers deeds an essential component of faith, thereby viewing perpetrators of major sins as having exited the state of faith. In contrast, the Murji’ah developed a theological–rational epistemology that separates faith from deeds and postpones judgment regarding major sinners to God’s ultimate decision. Meanwhile, Ahlussunnah formulated an integrative epistemology that combines belief in the heart, verbal affirmation, and deeds within the structure of faith without declaring major sinners as unbelievers. This study highlights that differences in the concept of deeds in Islamic theology are not merely doctrinal but also reflect distinct epistemological frameworks in interpreting religious sources. The findings contribute conceptually to the study of ʿilm al-kalām by offering a comparative mapping of the epistemology of deeds across three major theological traditions in Islam.
Ekosistem Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis al-Qur’an: Integrasi Kurikulum, Pembelajaran, dan Budaya Madrasah Tofan Rinaldi; Muhammad Alfi Syahrin
ARZUSIN Vol 6 No 2 (2026): APRIL
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/arzusin.v6i2.9308

Abstract

Although Al-Qur’an-based Islamic education has a strategic role in shaping students’ religious character, its implementation in madrasahs is often not yet systematically integrated into the curriculum and school culture. This study aims to analyze the implementation and internalization of Qur’anic values in shaping the religious character of students at MI Al-Ukhuwah Sukoharjo. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach involving the madrasah principal, teachers, and students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, and were then analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that Qur’anic values were implemented integratively through curriculum design, cross-subject learning processes, and the religious culture of the madrasah. The internalization process took place through habituation and teacher role modeling, which contributed to the formation of students’ religious character, as reflected in consistency in worship, honesty, trustworthiness, discipline, and social responsibility. This study concludes that Al-Qur’an-based Islamic education is effective in shaping religious character when it is systematically integrated into the institutional, pedagogical, and cultural ecosystem of the madrasah. These findings contribute to strengthening the study of character education based on Qur’anic values and provide practical implications for madrasahs in designing the sustainable integration of curriculum, learning, and school culture.
Spektrum Epistemologi Kritik Hadis Kontemporer: Analisis Komparatif Metodologi Takhrīj al-Hadis al-Albani dan Muqbil bin Hadi al-Wadi‘i Tofan Rinaldi; Muhammad Jadid Khadavi
Moral : Jurnal kajian Pendidikan Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Maret : Moral : Jurnal kajian Pendidikan Islam
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Agama dan Filsafat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/moral.v3i1.1983

Abstract

The study of takhrij al-hadith plays a crucial role in hadith scholarship, involving the tracing of transmission sources and evaluating the authenticity of sanad and matn through systematic analysis. In contemporary studies, differences in scholars’ approaches have led to variations in hadith classification and epistemological orientation. However, comparative research examining methodological criticism, epistemological foundations, and operational procedures of modern takhrij remains limited. This study aims to critically compare the methodologies of Muḥammad Nāṣiruddīn al-Albānī and Muqbil bin Hādī al-Wādiʿī, focusing on their evaluation of sanad and matn. Using a qualitative approach with an integrative literature review, this research analyzes primary works and relevant academic sources. The findings reveal three main epistemological patterns: independent reasoning through cross-narration, methodological caution based on classical authority, and a shared reliance on jarḥ wa taʿdīl. These differences influence hadith classification and reflect varying depths of criticism. The study shows that contemporary hadith criticism forms an epistemological spectrum rather than a strict methodological divide. It also highlights implications for religious practices, including the Megengan tradition in Java, which adapts to socio-economic contexts, and enriches comparative studies in hadith methodology.