Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Mariska Regina Martha
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis terhadap Kewenangan Jaksa Mengajukan Kasasi atas Putusan Bebas (Vrijspraak) dalam Perkara Pidana Mariska Regina Martha; Syamsuri
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Pluralisme Hukum, Kekhususan Daerah, dan Perlindungan Hukum
Publisher : LP3M Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Al-Banna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70193/jurisprudensi.v2i02.03

Abstract

Judicial power is a key pillar of the rule of law in Indonesia. In criminal proceedings, acquittal (vrijspraak) decisions raise debate because Article 244 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) normatively prohibits prosecutors from filing cassation against acquittals. However, Supreme Court jurisprudence and Constitutional Court Decision No. 114/PUU-X/2012 have opened limited space for such cassation. This study analyzes the prosecutor’s authority, its legal basis and limits, and its implications for legal certainty and justice, using authority theory within normative legal research (conceptual and legislative approaches) based on KUHAP, jurisprudence, and Constitutional Court decisions. The findings show that the prosecutor’s cassation authority gains legitimacy through these legal developments but is restricted to non-pure acquittals, namely where the acquittal results from misapplication of law, excess of judicial authority, or non-legal considerations. Therefore, cassation against acquittals functions as a judicial correction mechanism to safeguard law enforcement and substantive justice.
Co-Authors SYAMSURI