Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Al-Ahnaf: Journal of Islamic Education, Learning and Religious Studies
Ahmad Baehaki
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Islamic Studies through a Sociological Approach: A Study of Atho Mudzhar's Thoughts Ahmad Baehaki
Al-Ahnaf: Journal of Islamic Education, Learning and Religious Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Penerbit Hellow Pustaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61166/ahnaf.v1i2.15

Abstract

Sebagai sebuah agama, Islam bisa dikaji dalam berbagai pendekatan atau sudut pandang yang berbeda. Di dalam Al-Qur’an dan Hadits, sebagai sumber utama hukum Islam, masalah sosial (muamalah) lebih banyak disinggung dibanding masalah lainnya. Diantara cara memahami Islam adalah dengan sudut pandang sosiologi. Beberapa ahli sosiologi telah merancang teori pendekatan sosiologi agama. Dalam perkembangan studi Islam di Indonesia, Atho Mudzhar dikenal sebagai peletak dasar konsep pendekatan sosiologi dalam studi Islam. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pemikiran Atho Mudzhar tentang pendekatan sosiologi dalam studi Islam. Melaui metode kajian kepustakaan (library research) terhadap sumber-sumber literatur yang ada, penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa dalam pandangan Atho Mudzhar, Islam bukan hanya sebatas wahyu dan kepercayaan. Hubungan interaksi antara muslim dan pemeluk agama lain dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat merupakan gejala sosial. Oleh karena itu, pendekatan sosiologi dalam studi Islam sangat penting sebagimana pendeketan laiinya. Ia juga menyusun metodologi penelitian dengan pendekatan sosiologi.
The Ḥadīth al-Ifk and the Contemporary Challenge of Hoaxes: A Study of Fakhruddin al-Razi’s Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb Ahmad Baehaki; Muhammad Luthfi Mubarok
Al-Ahnaf: Journal of Islamic Education, Learning and Religious Studies Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Penerbit Hellow Pustaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61166/ahnaf.v2i3.34

Abstract

This article explores the relevance of classical Qur’anic exegesis to contemporary challenges of misinformation, focusing on Fakhruddin al-Razi’s interpretation of Q.S. al-Nūr [24]:11–20 concerning the ḥadīth al-ifk the slander against Aisyah r.a. In Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb, al-Razi not only defends Aisyah’s honor but also constructs a moral and epistemological framework for assessing news and allegations. He differentiates between ordinary lies (kidhb), fabricated accusations (iftirā’), and ifk as a specific form of falsehood with greater psychological and social impact. Al-Razi criticizes the believers of his time for failing to uphold ethical standards when dealing with unverified information, highlighting the importance of ḥusn al-ẓann (positive presumption), tathabbut (verification), and bayyina (clear evidence) as Qur’anic imperatives. Through a thematic and analytical reading of al-Razi’s tafsir, this study argues that his exegetical approach combines theological depth, rational inquiry, and contextual awareness offering timeless ethical guidance. In the digital age, where hoaxes and slander proliferate rapidly, the ethical principles derived from al-Razi’s interpretation serve as a crucial reminder of Islam’s emphasis on justice, restraint, and the preservation of human dignity in all forms of communication. This study concludes that reviving Qur’anic ethics in dealing with information is vital for fostering an intellectually responsible and morally upright Muslim society in the face of modern challenges.
The Deconstruction of Milk al-yamīn Muhammad Shahrūr and Abdul Aziz's Interpretation: Analysis of Maqāṣid al-Sharīah from the Perspective of Maslahat and Mafsadat Muhammad Miqdad Al Ghifari Syatta; Ahmad Baehaki; Ida Fitri Anggarini
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH) UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v11i2.329

Abstract

The interpretations of milk al-yamīn proposed by Muhammad Shaḥrūr and Abdul Aziz have been characterized as liberal by various Muslim scholarly communities. This characterization stems from their apparent neglect of established interpretative methodologies and the disregard for the prevailing moral frameworks that have historically governed such exegeses. Consequently, their readings are perceived to align with the objectives of secular feminist discourse. In response, Abdul Mustaqim offers a critical evaluation of their work, identifying several key deficiencies, including ontological, methodological, ideological, and epistemological shortcomings. In light of these critiques, a more rigorous reassessment of Shaḥrūr and Abdul Aziz’s interpretations is warranted, particularly through the lens of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (the objectives of Islamic law). Such an analysis aims to delineate the theoretical boundaries that these scholars may have transgressed. Employing a qualitative research design, this study examines Shaḥrūr’s Al-Kitāb wa Al-Qur’an alongside Abdul Aziz’s dissertation, utilizing theoretical and critical analytical techniques. The qualitative critical analysis facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the appropriate interpretative framework for milk al-yamīn.
Co-Authors Ida Fitri Anggarini Muhammad Luthfi Mubarok Muhammad Miqdad Al Ghifari Syatta