Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintahan
Fadhli Zul Fauzi
Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
REVOLUTIONARY NATIONALISM AND EARLY STATE-BUILDING: DIVERGENT PATH OF NKRUMAH AND SOEKARNO Pietro Fasola; Fadhli Zul Fauzi
Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Vol 18 No 2 (2025): Volume 18 Nomor 2: Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja
Publisher : Fakultas Politik Pemerintahan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article presents a comparative historical analysis of postcolonial state-building under the leadership of Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and Sukarno in Indonesia. It argues that revolutionary nationalism functioned as a double-edged force, enabling mass mobilization and political legitimacy while simultaneously generating institutional fragility in newly independent states. Employing a qualitative historical-comparative methodology and a most similar systems design, the study examines how colonial institutional legacies, bureaucratic capacity, strategies of political legitimacy, civil–military relations, social fragmentation, and Cold War geopolitics shaped divergent state-building trajectories in the two cases.The analysis shows that although both leaders pursued anti-imperialist agendas, state-led development, and mass mobilization, they adopted contrasting political strategies in response to distinct domestic and international constraints. Nkrumah relied on political centralization and a single-party system to compensate for weak administrative capacity, whereas Sukarno emphasized ideological integration and symbolic unity through Guided Democracy within a highly pluralistic social context. In both cases, however, these strategies were structurally constrained and ultimately contributed to political instability and regime collapse.The article concludes that postcolonial state-building cannot be explained by leadership charisma alone but must be understood as a product of the interaction between institutional inheritance, societal formation, political authority, and global forces.
THE EVOLUTION OF NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE IN INDONESIA: POLICIES, PROGRESS, AND CHALLENGES Fadhli Zul Fauzi
Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintahan Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintahan Volume 8 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Politik Pemerintahan IPDN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33701/jkp.v8i1.5559

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the development of National Health Insurance (NHI) in Indonesia, with every progress and challenges in its evolution. Using a longitudinal case study that enables a nuanced examination of policy processes, shifts, and complexities within their evolving socio-political contexts, this research will explore the dynamics of health insurance policy development over an extended period. Before the establishment of BPJS Kesehatan in 2014, Indonesia’s health insurance landscape was shaped by various schemes targeting different population groups, such as Askes for civil servants, Jamsostek for formal workers, and Jamkesmas for the poor. While these programs expanded access to healthcare, their fragmentation posed challenges to achieving a more inclusive and integrated system. In response, the government initiated a major reform through the establishment of BPJS Kesehatan as part of its commitment to realizing Universal Health Coverage for all citizen. While challenges in resource efficiency and service delivery remain—particularly as BPJS Kesehatan manages far broader coverage than its predecessors—the ongoing reforms reflect Indonesia’s continued commitment to strengthening its health insurance system, improving service quality, and advancing toward Universal Health Coverage through more integrated, accessible, and trusted care. Keywords: Social Protection; Health Policy; National Health Insurance
Co-Authors Pietro Fasola