Fiqi Restu Subekti
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Religious Discourse and the Reproduction of Injustice Against Marginalized Workers Fiqi Restu Subekti; Noni Kensiwi
International Review of Social and Cultural Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : CV Projurnal Mitra Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66324/irscs.v1i3.186

Abstract

Religion is commonly perceived as a source of moral guidance and social cohesion. However, within contemporary workplace settings, religious discourse can be strategically deployed to regulate employment relations and shape worker behaviour. This study investigates how religious discourse is employed to reproduce injustices against marginalized workers within contemporary workplace settings. Aimed at identifying discursive forms, analyzing the factors that facilitate the reproduction of injustice, and exploring its consequences, the study adopts a literature-review approach that traces news coverage, public opinion, and social-media discourse as primary data sources. The findings reveal three principal forms through which injustice is reproduced: (1) the ideologization of moral values that reframes structural problems as personal failings; (2) the sacralization of hierarchical structures that grants moral legitimacy to managerial authority; and (3) the instrumentalization of religious symbols and rituals as mechanisms of social control. Factors reinforcing these processes include conservative religious interpretations, entrenched structural power relations, the psychological internalization of religious values, and cultural norms promoting compliance. The implications comprise an erosion of workers’ critical consciousness, the reinforcement of socio-economic inequality, increased psychological and spiritual burdens, and a weakening of labor solidarity. The study concludes that religious discourse can operate as a tool for conserving the status quo rather than as a catalyst for social justice.
From Structural Oppression to Social Liberation: A Progressive Reconstruction of the Exegesis of Surah al-Balad Mutiullah; Fiqi Restu Subekti
Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 22 No. 1: June 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Studi Islam dan Peradaban, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/afkaruna.v22i1.28515

Abstract

Surah al-Balad is recognized as a seminal text in the struggle for the emancipation of the oppressed, resistance to oligarchic practices, and advocacy for the poor. This article examines the scarcity of progressive interpretations of al-Balad, which has confined the surah to ritual reading rather than a practical foundation for social advocacy. In response to the increasing complexity of contemporary social problems, the study aims to reconstruct al-Balad as a theological basis for contemporary social transformation. It employs historical description, hermeneutic analysis of the al-Balad text, and semiotic methods to uncover more authentic meanings. The findings indicate that al-Balad calls on believers to resist injustice and to establish a welfare-oriented social order; the text expresses divine condemnation of oligarchic actors characterized by greed and the subjugation of the vulnerable. The study concludes that the concentration of political and economic power in the hands of a few undermines social order and therefore compels adherents to take a firm stance through both the consolidation of faith and the improvement of their economic conditions. The article recommends raising believers’ critical awareness of their responsibility to support the economically disadvantaged and advancing efforts to create a more equitable economic system to achieve social welfare.