Rezeki, Abdillah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Empirical Performance of E2E Frameworks in React-Vue SPAs Using DIA Rezeki, Abdillah; Saputro, Setyo Wahyu; Saragih, Triando Hamonangan; Nugroho, Radityo Adi; Abadi, Friska
International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): April 2026 - International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Modern web applications increasingly adopt Single-Page Application (SPA) architectures to enhance the user experience through client-side rendering and dynamic content loading. However, these characteristics introduce significant challenges for automated end-to-end (E2E) testing, including asynchronous DOM manipulation, complex state management, and timing synchronization issues. This study presents a comprehensive empirical comparison of three prominent E2E testing frameworks—Selenium WebDriver, Cypress, and Playwright—across React and Vue-based SPAs. Using a quantitative experimental approach, 25 standardized test cases were executed 15 times each across Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, for a total of 270 testing sessions. Performance evaluation focused on four key metrics: execution time, success rate, CPU usage, and memory consumption. Results demonstrate that Playwright achieved the fastest execution time (56.25 seconds on React-Chrome), while Selenium exhibited superior resource efficiency with the lowest memory consumption (196.59 MB on Vue-Chrome). The Distance to Ideal Alternative (DIA) multi-criteria decision analysis method identified Playwright-Chrome as optimal for React applications (DIA score: 0.886715) and Selenium-Chrome for Vue applications (DIA score: 0.908237), indicating that framework selection should be context-dependent based on application characteristics and deployment requirements. This research supports the conclusion that no universal "best" testing framework exists, underscoring the importance of evidence-based, application-specific tool selection in software quality assurance.