Riyahi, Abdellah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Data-Driven and Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Structural Health Monitoring of the Z24 Bridge Riyahi, Abdellah; Mestari, Mohammed; Bouihi, Bouchra
Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum Vol. 12 No. 2 (May 2026)
Publisher : Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jcef.24173

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is crucial for maintaining the sustainability and safety of civil infrastructure. The Z24 Bridge in Switzerland remains one of the benchmark datasets used to validate vibration-based damage detection methods. Traditional approaches based exclusively on modal parameters are frequently limited by data scarcity and environmental variability. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have enabled data-driven neural networks to learn discriminative features directly from raw measurements. Meanwhile, hybrid methods such as Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) incorporate governing physical laws into the learning process. This study presents a comparative analysis of three successive artificial Neural Network models (NN V1–V3) and One Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN V1), all applied to the Z24 Bridge dataset. The NN models progressively improve in depth, optimization strategy, and regularization, achieving ≈97.7% validation accuracy and a macro AUC ≈1.00 with NN V3. However, they remain completely dependent on the quality and quantity of training data. In contrast, the PINN incorporates the differential equation of a damped oscillator into its loss function, balancing a data-driven term with a physics-based residual. This approach enables more stable learning with limited labeled data and ensures consistency with structural dynamics. Experimental results highlight the trade-off between accuracy and robustness: while NN V3 yields the highest predictive performance (≈97.7% validation accuracy, macro AUC ≈1.00), PINN V1 achieves slightly lower accuracy (≈92%) but offers improved stability and interpretability. This dual perspective demonstrates that hybrid physics-informed models provide a more reliable basis for decision-making in SHM. The findings underscore the potential of combining machine learning with physical knowledge, paving the way for future developments such as hybrid PINNs (HPINNs), multi-sensor integration, and high-performance computing deployment.