Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparison of Outcomes between Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in Colorectal Cancer at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jeo, Wifanto Saditya; Noorsukma, Hutomo Rezky
Indonesian Journal of Cancer Vol 20, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : http://dharmais.co.id/

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33371/ijoc.v20i1.1516

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common types of cancer in the world and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Laparotomy is the standard curative treatment for localized disease. Laparoscopy offers several advantages, including less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, faster recovery, and lower risk of infection. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in CRC, particularly at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta. Methods: This retrospective study included CRC patients who underwent laparoscopy (56 subjects) and laparotomy (79 subjects) from 2022 to 2024 in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Inclusion criteria were: patients aged over 18 years, diagnosed with stage I–III colorectal cancer, and treated with either laparoscopic or open surgical resection. The outcomes were hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, complications, surgical duration, and surgical fee. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables, and the independent T-test was used for continuous variables.Results: A total of 135 CRC patients (54.8% female) with a mean age of 54.74±12.90 years old were recruited in this study. Nearly half of the patients (49.6%) had tumors located in the rectum. We found that laparoscopy was associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications (OR = 0.091; 95%CI 0.011–0.777; p = 0.008) and a lower risk of 2-year mortality (OR = 0.395; 95% CI 0.178–0.878; p = 0.054). We found no significant difference between hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, and surgical cost in bivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in surgery duration (B -0.196; p = 0.025) and surgical fee (B 0.263; p = 0.028), with no significant differences in blood loss, postoperative complications, treatment duration, and 2-year mortality rate.Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery offers significant lower risk of postoperative complications. Although it was not statistically significant, we also found that laparoscopy had a lower trend of 2-year mortality. These findings support the use of laparoscopy as a safe approach for appropriately selected patients, though further studies are warranted in complex and advanced cases.
The Outcome of Snare Loop Catheter for Foreign Body Removal in Superior Vena Cava: An Evidence-Based Case Report Noorsukma, Hutomo Rezky; Darwis, Patrianef
The New Ropanasuri Journal of Surgery Vol. 10, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Introduction. In recent years, the utilization of central venous catheters (CVC) in medical practice has become increasingly common. One of the complications associated with central venous catheterization is embolization of catheter fragments, which arefound in 1% of cases. Currently, endovascular techniques, such as snare loop catheter, have been developed for the extraction of intravascular foreign bodies. However, there is no strong evidence regarding this method. Thisliterature review aims toevaluate the efficacy and safety of snare loop catheters for foreign body removal within the superior vena cava (SVC). Method. We searched four databases, that is Cochrane, PubMed, EBSCO, and ProQuest. We only included studies relevant to our clinical question about the efficacy and safety of snare loop catheter for foreign body removal in SVC. Results. We found 24 case reports and 10 case series from our search with a total of 224 cases. The effectiveness of the snare loop in extracting intravascular foreign bodies from the 34 articles was 97.77%, and the snare loop was successful in removing foreign bodies in 218 cases. We only found 7 cases of complications after the procedure, which are supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (3 cases), hematoma (3 cases), and tricuspid regurgitation (1 case). Conclusion. The removal of foreign bodies in the superior vena cava using a snare-loop catheter is effective and relatively safe. However, further studies with a higher level of evidence are still needed