Andry Dwiarnanto
Borobudur University

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

FAIRNESS IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF ROYALTIES FOR PERFORMERS AND RECORD PRODUCERS AS RELATED RIGHTS HOLDERS Andry Dwiarnanto; Faisal Santiago
MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, dan Viktimologi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi Dan Viktimologi (April)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/mis.v3i1.257

Abstract

Related rights, integral to intellectual property safeguards, confer economic entitlements upon contributors to phonogram performance and production. Royalty allocation to beneficiaries proceeds principally via Collective Management Institutions (LMK) and the National Collective Management Institution (LMKN), per Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright and Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021 on Song and/or Music Copyright Royalty Administration. Employing normative juridical methodology with statutory and conceptual emphases, this study reveals that despite normative royalty frameworks, practical hurdles persist: opaque LMK oversight, deficient work utilization tracking, and user noncompliance with payment duties. Moreover, equitable royalty apportionment for performers and producers remains suboptimal. Regulatory fortification, LMK transparency elevation, and digital technology adoption are imperative for equitable, efficacious distribution benefiting related rights stakeholders.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AS AN INSTRUMENT TO INCREASE THE COMPETITIVENESS OF LOCAL PRODUCTS IN INDONESIA Andry Dwiarnanto; Evita Isretno Israhadi
MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, dan Viktimologi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi Dan Viktimologi (April)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/mis.v3i1.258

Abstract

Indonesia's juridical safeguards for Geographical Indications expose pronounced disparities between statutory constructs and execution realities. This inquiry dissects GI protection regimes normatively and comparatively, delineates regulation-implementation chasms (das sollen versus das sein) with attendant barriers, and proposes a tactical GI safeguard paradigm elevating Indonesian regional goods' global market prowess. Adopting normative juridical inquiry via statutory, doctrinal, and cross-jurisdictional methods, results affirm Law Number 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications furnishes TRIPs-conformant comprehensive protections. Implementation, however, falters amid lax post-grant oversight, producer communities' juridical ignorance, provincial authorities' institutional shortfalls, and vast untapped local product potentials. These deficits curtail GIs' catalytic impact on competitiveness. An encompassing tactical paradigm—fusing registration bolstering, tech-enabled post-registration administration, and enduring multi-actor symbiosis—proves requisite.