Sofyatun Nisa
Universitas Islam Ibrahimy Banyuwangi, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Teoritis Pendekatan Resource-Based Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kemandirian Belajar : Sebuah Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis Sofyatun Nisa; Kini Tri Utami; Riza Faishol
Jurnal Wahana Literasi Pendidikan Vol 1 No 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : CV. Lentera Literasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58472/jwlp.v1i1.267

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the theoretical relationship between the Resource-Based Learning (RBL) approach and the enhancement of self-directed learning through a systematic literature review. The research background is based on the shift in the educational paradigm from teacher-centered to learner-centered, driven by technological developments and access to increasingly diverse learning resources. RBL is seen as a relevant approach to empowering learners in managing independent learning. However, previous studies tend to focus on specific learning outcomes without investigating the mechanisms underlying the relationship between RBL and self-directed learning in depth. Therefore, this study has the following objectives: (1) to identify key RBL principles that support self-directed learning; (2) to analyze the psychological and pedagogical mechanisms in the process; and (3) to map the supporting and inhibiting factors of RBL effectiveness in the context of developing self-directed learning. The research method used is a systematic literature review with a qualitative approach based on thematic analysis. Data were collected from SINTA-indexed national journals and international publications accessed through Google Scholar, the Garuda Portal, and the SINTA database, with publications limited to the last 10 years (2014–2024). The analysis procedure adapted the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework through the stages of identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and inclusion of articles. The validity of the findings was enhanced through source triangulation and peer debriefing. The results revealed three key principles of RBL: source diversity, learner autonomy, and inquiry-based learning. These three principles encourage independent learning through mechanisms of increasing self-efficacy, strengthening self-regulation, and shifting the locus of control to internal learners. The implementation of RBL is supported by factors such as teacher competence, the availability of learning resources, and a conducive school culture, but is hampered by the digital literacy gap, misaligned evaluation systems, and a dense curriculum load. This study provides an integrated conceptual framework for the development of empowering learning practices and recommendations for further empirical research.
The Effect of Brainstorming and Recall-Based Learning on Eleventh-Grade Students’ Learning Outcomes Sofyatun Nisa; Imam Mashuri; Rifqi Firdaus
Ainara Journal (Jurnal Penelitian dan PKM Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Ainara Journal (Jurnal Penelitian dan PKM Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Wilayah (elrispeswil)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54371/ainj.v7i2.1368

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Round Robin Brainstorming (RRB) and Memory Recall Examine (MRE) learning models in improving students’ cognitive learning outcomes in Islamic Religious Education and Character Education (PAI and BP). The research employed a quasi-experimental design using a nonequivalent group pretest–posttest approach involving 36 eleventh-grade students of SMAN Darussholah Singojuruh divided into two treatment groups. Learning outcome data were collected through cognitive tests administered before and after the intervention and analyzed using paired sample t-tests, independent sample t-tests, normalized gain (N-Gain), effect size (Cohen’s d), and coefficient of determination (R²) with SPSS 22. The findings revealed that both learning models significantly improved students’ cognitive learning outcomes (p < 0.05). The MRE group achieved higher improvement with an N-Gain score of 0.62 and a very large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.74), while the RRB group showed moderate improvement with an N-Gain score of 0.45 and Cohen’s d = 0.65. The R² value of 0.65 indicated that 65% of the variance in learning outcomes was explained by the implemented learning models. These findings suggest that MRE is more effective in improving cognitive learning outcomes, whereas RRB better promotes student engagement and collaborative participation during structured group discussions.