Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Menara : Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia
Ahmad Tiaz Gozali
Universitas Pamulang
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGARUH LINGKUNGAN KERJA NON FISIK DAN KOMUNIKASI TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI RUMAH SAKIT UMUM DAERAH KOTA TANGERANG Ahmad Tiaz Gozali; Andri Priadi
Jurnal Menara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Maret 2026
Publisher : Al Hasanah Barokah Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65978/jm.v3i1.79

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of non-physical work environment and communication on employee performance at Tangerang City Hospital. The method used is quantitative. The sampling technique used the Slovin formula and obtained a sample of 83 respondents. Data analysis used validity test, reliability test, classical assumption test, regression analysis, correlation coefficient, determination coefficient and hypothesis test. The results of this study are that the non-physical work environment has a significant effect on employee performance with the regression equation Y = 15.862 + 0.592X1, a correlation coefficient of 0.622 with a determination coefficient of 38.7% and the hypothesis test obtained t count> t table or (7.153 > 1.990). Communication has a significant effect on employee performance with the regression equation Y = 12.600 + 0.680X2, a correlation coefficient of 0.712 with a determination coefficient of 50.7% and the hypothesis test obtained t count> t table or (9.121 > 1.990). Non- physical work environment and communication simultaneously have a significant effect on employee performance with the regression equation Y = 8.174 + 0.293X1+ 0.505X2. The correlation coefficient value is 0.754 and the determination coefficient is 56.8% while the remaining 43.2% is influenced by other factors. Hypothesis testing obtained the calculated F value > F table or (52.680 > 2.720).
Co-Authors Andri Priadi