p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Health Dynamics
Suparji Suparji
Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Dengue Fever Prevention Behavior at the Household Level in High and Low Incidence Areas: A Cross-Sectoral Comparative Study in the Tropics [Accepted] Suparji Suparji; Budi Joko Santosa; Agung Suharto; Nurlailis Saadah; Heru Santoso Wahito Nugroho; Sunarto Sunarto; Alfi Rusdianti
Health Dynamics Vol 3, No 1 (2026): January 2026 (In progress)
Publisher : Knowledge Dynamics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Dengue fever remains a major public health concern in tropical regions, including Indonesia. Household-level knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) play a critical role in sustainable vector control. This study aimed to compare KAP regarding dengue prevention among household heads in high- and low-incidence areas in Magetan Regency, Indonesia. Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted among 785 household heads selected using stratified random sampling. A total of 390 respondents were recruited from high-incidence areas (≥11 cases/year) and 395 from low-incidence areas (≤10 cases/year). Data were collected using a validated and reliable structured questionnaire measuring knowledge (45 items), attitudes (18 items), and practices (25 items). Spearman rank correlation was used to examine associations between sociodemographic factors and KAP scores, and the Mann–Whitney U test was applied to compare differences between groups. Results: Knowledge and attitude scores did not differ significantly between high- and low-incidence areas (p > 0.05). However, prevention practice scores were significantly higher in high-incidence areas (Mean = 15.51; SD = 4.37) compared to low-incidence areas (Mean = 12.94; SD = 5.91; p < 0.001). Age was positively associated with attitudes and practices in both areas, while education level was significantly correlated with knowledge. Employment status was associated with prevention practices, whereas gender showed no significant association with KAP. Conclusions: Dengue prevention practices were stronger in high-incidence areas, suggesting that direct exposure to disease risk influences behavioral responses more than knowledge alone. Strengthening community empowerment and behavior-focused interventions is essential, particularly in low-incidence areas, to enhance preparedness and prevent future outbreaks.Keywords: dengue fever, knowledge, attitude, practice, household, prevention behavior
Developing a Community-Based Non-Structural Disaster Mitigation Module Integrating Local Knowledge: Evidence from Indonesia as a Middle-Income Country [Accepted] Suparji Suparji; Heru Santoso Wahito Nugroho; Sunarto Sunarto; Alfi Rusdianti
Health Dynamics Vol 3, No 2 (2026): February 2026 (In progress)
Publisher : Knowledge Dynamics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Natural disasters continue to pose significant challenges globally, particularly in disaster-prone middle-income countries such as Indonesia, where communities are frequently exposed to hydrometeorological and geological hazards. While structural mitigation remains important, non-structural and community-based approaches are increasingly emphasized to enhance contextual relevance and community engagement in disaster risk reduction. This study aimed to develop and assess the feasibility of a community-based non-structural disaster mitigation module integrating local knowledge as an educational resource for disaster-prone communities. Methods: The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using a simplified adaptation of the Borg and Gall model. The development process included a needs assessment through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, module design and development, expert validation, and a limited field trial with target community users. Data were collected using qualitative methods and structured questionnaires, and analyzed descriptively to examine feasibility, acceptability, and relevance.. Results: The results indicate that the developed module achieved high feasibility scores across content, presentation, language, and integration of local knowledge. User assessments from the limited field trial demonstrated high levels of acceptability and relevance, particularly in relation to clarity, contextual suitability, and usefulness as a learning resource. Revisions based on expert and user feedback were incorporated into the final version of the module.. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study provides early empirical evidence supporting the feasibility and acceptability of a community-based non-structural disaster mitigation module that integrates local knowledge. The module shows potential for use as an educational tool to support community disaster preparedness activities within similar middle-income country contexts.Keywords: Community-based disaster risk reduction;  Non-structural disaster mitigation;   Module development; Local knowledge integration; Research and Development