Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Al-Kawakib SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica
Rena Zulfaidah
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Reconstruction of Legal Norms on the Criminal Offense of Bank Account Trading for Online Gambling: An Islamic Criminal Law Perspective Muhamad Abdul Kholik; Rena Zulfaidah; Ananda Dewi Maharani; Ismail Ismail; Nisa Afifah
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.13947

Abstract

Ideally, the Indonesian criminal law system should be able to encompass all actors within the chain of online gambling crimes, including account sellers as facilitators of financial transactions. However, the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), and banking regulations have not yet criminalized the practice of buying and selling bank accounts as an independent offense. Law enforcement still relies on Articles 55–56 of the KUHP, which are weak in proving mens rea, resulting in a normative gap and a low deterrent effect amid the rise of digital gambling. This study aims to analyze the practice of buying and selling bank accounts in online gambling, examine criminal liability from the perspective of Islamic law through the concept of ta‘zīr al-mu‘īn ‘alā al-ma‘ṣiyah, and formulate an integrative normative reconstruction. The method used is juridical-normative with a conceptual-comparative approach, analyzing primary and secondary legal materials through qualitative-descriptive methods. The results indicate that account sellers can be classified as mu‘īn (facilitators of sin) who violate the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah), particularly ḥifẓ al-māl (protection of property) and ḥifẓ al-dīn (protection of religion). A new legal provision is recommended to explicitly criminalize such acts, with a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment or a fine of up to IDR 500 million, in order to close legal gaps and respond to digital crime.
Reconstructing Zakat Governance Through Qur’anic Perspectives Dian May Syifa; Budi Rahmat Hakim; Yulia Hafizah; M Yakhsyallah Liddinillah; Rena Zulfaidah; Farid Hamdani
Jurnal Kawakib Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Islamic Studies
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/kwkib.v7i1.447

Abstract

Zakat management in Indonesia faces a critical challenge regarding the legal ambiguity between private and public domains, leading to low accountability and latent corruption risks within zakat institutions. This study aims to reformulate the conceptual foundations of zakat governance by integrating Al-Quran's normative values into a modern governance framework. Employing a qualitative method with a thematic interpretation (maudhu’i) approach, this research analyzes Quranic verses concerning institutional legitimacy (QS. At-Taubah: 103), distribution principles (QS. At-Taubah: 60), wealth ethics and anti-manipulation (QS. Al-Baqarah: 264, 267) and verses on integration of social worship (QS. Al-Baqarah: 110). The findings reveal that the Al-Quran mandates an integration between ritual piety and social justice, where the state holds a constitutional role as a facilitator through the principle of "public religious fund". This research constructs the "Qur’anic Governance of Zakat" model, which emphasizes strengthening legitimacy through radical transparency, empowerment-based distribution, and an integrated integrity-monitoring system within national law. The novelty of this study lies in its synthesis of classical interpretations with contemporary governance realities to bridge the gap between religious norms and administrative practices.
Harmonisasi Fungsi Non-Judicial Review Ombudsman dengan Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Agung dalam Pengujian Kebijakan Publik: Harmonizing the Ombudsman's Non-Judicial Review Function with the Supreme Court's Judicial Review Authority in Public Policy Review Rena Zulfaidah; Tatang Astarudin
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Siyasi
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v3i2.56556

Abstract

This study analyzes the urgency of harmonizing the non-judicial review function of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia with the judicial review authority of the Supreme Court in assessing public policies. Amidst increasingly complex policy dynamics and the diversification of modern economic instruments, effective oversight mechanisms are crucial to maintaining the integrity of good governance. The core issue addressed is the overlap in perception and lack of systemic coordination, which leads to legal uncertainty for the public. Using a juridical-normative legal research method with a conceptual approach, this study evaluates the scope of authority, legal basis, and practical implications of both institutions. The results indicate that harmonization is the key to creating a comprehensive oversight system, wherein the Ombudsman addresses maladministration and sociological aspects, while the Supreme Court focuses on testing legislative norms. This synergy not only prevents oversight redundancy but also enhances legal process efficiency and national budget effectiveness. This study offers policy propositions regarding data integration and inter-institutional coordination as a solution model to ensure that every state action remains grounded in the principles of justice, transparency, and social benefit. Thus, this harmonization serves as an absolute prerequisite for building a responsive and just rule of law for all citizens in the contemporary era.
Co-Authors Ananda Dewi Maharani Budi Rahmat Hakim Dian May Syifa Farid Hamdani Ismail Ismail M Yakhsyallah Liddinillah Muhamad Abdul Kholik Nisa Afifah Tatang Astarudin Yulia Hafizah