Syifa Rana Tsary
Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reinterpretation of the Advocate Code of Ethics in Facing the Digitalization of Legal Practice Angelia Frisca; Intan Agustin; Ema Agustin; Bagus Wahyu; Ahmad Hasan; M. Afiq Safana; Syifa Rana Tsary
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Maret: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Muda Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56127/jukim.v5i02.2648

Abstract

The development of information technology has driven fundamental transformations in legal practice and the working patterns of the legal profession. The digitalization of the judiciary through e-Court, the use of social media, and online legal communication have reshaped the way advocates deliver legal services. These developments enhance efficiency and access to justice; however, they also generate new ethical challenges that may undermine the integrity and professionalism of advocates. The Indonesian Advocates’ Code of Ethics, as a normative instrument, is required to remain relevant to the evolving dynamics of digital legal practice. This study examines the relevance of ethical regulations in responding to digital legal practices and the need for their reinterpretation to preserve the dignity of the legal profession. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that conventionally oriented ethical regulations have not fully addressed ethical issues arising in digital spaces, particularly concerning social media, online publications, and the use of artificial intelligence. Therefore, a reinterpretation of the code of ethics that is adaptive to technological developments is necessary, without abandoning the values of officium nobile, in order to strengthen public trust in the legal profession.
Cross-Regional Jurisdiction Challenges of the E-Court System Due to Infrastructure Limitations and Their Impact on Civil Justice Access in Remote Areas Panca Hastomo; Rizal Santosa; Alindra Dwi; Ryan Shoim; Agung Pangestu; Sabta Tri; Aurelia Intan; Syifa Rana Tsary
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Maret: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Muda Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56127/jukim.v5i02.2649

Abstract

The transformation of legal services through the implementation of the E-Court system is part of judicial modernization aimed at realizing effective and inclusive access to justice. This study seeks to analyze the regulation of cross-regional jurisdiction under Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 1 of 2019 and to examine the challenges of digital infrastructure in providing access to justice for civil litigants in remote areas. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that PERMA Number 1 of 2019 enables the implementation of e-summons and electronic hearings without eliminating the court’s authority based on territorial jurisdiction. However, its effectiveness still depends on the consent of the parties and technical readiness. On the other hand, limitations in internet connectivity, technological devices, and digital literacy in underdeveloped, frontier, and outermost (3T) regions create disparities in access to justice. This study concludes that the transformation of legal services through E-Court requires regulatory strengthening, the development of digital infrastructure, and the implementation of a hybrid service model to ensure that the principles of justice, legal certainty, and utility are equitably realized for all people across Indonesia.