Muhammad Akrom Ramadhan
Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Prohibition of Interfaith Marriage Registration: A Critique of Judicial Policy Darryl Evan Brouwer; Muhammad Akrom Ramadhan; Ananda Lestari
Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan Vol 10 No 2 (2026): In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Dr. Soetomo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25139/lex.v10i2.11580

Abstract

In 2023, the Supreme Court enacted the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2023 on Guidelines for Judges in Adjudicating Cases of Marriage Registration Requests between People of Different Religions and Beliefs (SEMA 2/2023). The SEMA 2/2023 prohibits judges from granting applications for the registration of interfaith marriages between individuals of different religions and beliefs. This judicial policy does not cohere with the reality that some religions in Indonesia do not strictly prohibit interfaith marriage. Thus, such judicial policy unjustifiably infringes on the human rights of the citizens. This research is conducted to analyze the inconsistency of the SEMA 2/2023 with the Marriage Law, the reality of religious diversity in Indonesia, and the human rights principle. This research is conducted as normative legal research using the statutory and conceptual approach. The finding of this research is that the SEMA 2/2023 is in line with the Marriage Law, the reality of religious diversity in Indonesia, and the human rights principle. Thus, the judge shall not enforce the SEMA 2/2023.