Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING)
Nugraha Saefuddin
Universitas Widyatama
Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
THE IMPACT OF COMPENSATION, WORK MOTIVATION, AND JOB SATISFACTION ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AT PT X Dinda Rizka Aulia; Nugraha Saefuddin
Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31539/y45ann75

Abstract

Employee performance at PT X has faced significant challenges, evidenced by a decline in Key Performance Indicator (KPI) achievements from 82% in 2023 to 74% in 2025, consistently falling below the organizational target of 85%. This decline is purportedly linked to compensation levels that remain below industry standards and low employee satisfaction regarding career development and recognition. This study analyzes the impact of compensation, work motivation, and job satisfaction on employee performance at PT X. A quantitative research design employing multiple linear regression analysis was applied. The study population consisted of all permanent employees of PT X, totaling 33 respondents, selected using a census sampling technique. Data were processed using SPSS version 27. The results reveal that compensation exerts a statistically significant positive impact on employee performance (p = 0.036). Work motivation does not show a statistically significant impact (p = 0.068). In contrast, job satisfaction demonstrates a strong and significant positive impact on employee performance (p < 0.001). Simultaneously, compensation, work motivation, and job satisfaction significantly influence employee performance (F = 899.866; p < 0.001). The Adjusted R² value of 0.988 indicates that 98.8% of the variance in employee performance is explained by the research model.
Co-Authors Dinda Rizka Aulia