Desak Ketut Indrasari Utami
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana/Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Paradoxical Prognostic Value of Endogenous Melatonin in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mild-to-Moderate versus Malignant Infarctions Merry Angeline; Desak Ketut Indrasari Utami; Kumara Tini
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 6 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i6.1607

Abstract

Background: Acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. While endogenous melatonin is widely proposed as a neuroprotectant, recent clinical evidence suggests a paradoxical, severity-dependent prognostic relationship. This meta-analysis synthesises evidence regarding this paradox and its prognostic implications. Methods: A systematic search of major databases through March 2026 identified observational studies correlating endogenous melatonin levels with AIS clinical outcomes. Data were stratified by stroke severity phenotype, and standardised mean differences were calculated using random-effects meta-regression models. Results: Ten observational studies comprising 847 AIS patients were included. A striking paradox emerged: in patients with mild-to-moderate stroke, lower melatonin concentrations were associated with poor clinical outcomes. Conversely, in malignant middle cerebral artery infarctions, higher melatonin concentrations were paradoxically linked to worse clinical outcomes, including increased mortality. Extreme overall heterogeneity (I²=97.85%) was substantially resolved (I²=0%) upon proper severity stratification. Conclusion: The prognostic implications of endogenous melatonin fundamentally differ according to stroke severity phenotype. This severity-dependent paradox likely reflects context-dependent alterations in melatonin signalling pathway efficacy. Mechanistic investigations and well-designed prospective trials are urgently warranted to elucidate the underlying pathophysiology.
The Paradoxical Prognostic Value of Endogenous Melatonin in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mild-to-Moderate versus Malignant Infarctions Merry Angeline; Desak Ketut Indrasari Utami; Kumara Tini
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 6 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i6.1607

Abstract

Background: Acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. While endogenous melatonin is widely proposed as a neuroprotectant, recent clinical evidence suggests a paradoxical, severity-dependent prognostic relationship. This meta-analysis synthesises evidence regarding this paradox and its prognostic implications. Methods: A systematic search of major databases through March 2026 identified observational studies correlating endogenous melatonin levels with AIS clinical outcomes. Data were stratified by stroke severity phenotype, and standardised mean differences were calculated using random-effects meta-regression models. Results: Ten observational studies comprising 847 AIS patients were included. A striking paradox emerged: in patients with mild-to-moderate stroke, lower melatonin concentrations were associated with poor clinical outcomes. Conversely, in malignant middle cerebral artery infarctions, higher melatonin concentrations were paradoxically linked to worse clinical outcomes, including increased mortality. Extreme overall heterogeneity (I²=97.85%) was substantially resolved (I²=0%) upon proper severity stratification. Conclusion: The prognostic implications of endogenous melatonin fundamentally differ according to stroke severity phenotype. This severity-dependent paradox likely reflects context-dependent alterations in melatonin signalling pathway efficacy. Mechanistic investigations and well-designed prospective trials are urgently warranted to elucidate the underlying pathophysiology.
Efficacy and Safety of Melatonin on Pain Intensity and Sleep Quality in Adults with Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Maria Pamela Tiffani; Desak Ketut Indrasari Utami; I Putu Eka Widyadharma
Sriwijaya Journal of Neurology Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Sriwijaya Journal of Neurology
Publisher : Phlox Institute: Indonesian Medical Research Organization

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59345/sjn.v3i2.263

Abstract

Introduction: Neuropathic pain frequently coexists with sleep disturbance, and current pharmacotherapy is constrained by limited efficacy and adverse effects. Melatonin, a pleiotropic neurohormone with analgesic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and chronobiotic properties, has been proposed as an adjunctive treatment, but its magnitude of clinical benefit on pain and sleep across heterogeneous neuropathic-pain populations had not previously been quantitatively synthesised in a meta-analysis specific to neurology practice. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomised controlled trials of oral melatonin versus placebo or active control in adults with neuropathic pain, in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane RoB 2.0 with the crossover extension where applicable. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity (NRS or VAS); secondary outcomes were sleep quality (PSQI, ESS, sleep-interference NRS), responder rate (≥ 50 % pain reduction) and adverse events. Standardised mean differences (Hedges’ g) were pooled under a random-effects model with restricted maximum likelihood and Knapp–Hartung adjustment, with parallel raw mean differences on the NRS where instruments matched. Heterogeneity was quantified with I² and τ². Pre-specified subgroups examined etiology, dose and duration; sensitivity analyses used leave-one-out resampling and exclusion of the open-label and the mechanism-only trials. Results: Ten randomised controlled trials enrolling 491 participants were included. The exploratory primary pooled SMD across the two trials with extractable continuous pain data was −0.43 (95 % CI −4.86 to 4.00; I² = 77.8 %; P = 0.436); the wide interval reflects the Knapp–Hartung correction with k = 2 and is a structural feature of the methodology. The corresponding raw mean difference on the NRS 0–10 scale was −0.70 (95 % CI −1.99 to 0.59). Substantial heterogeneity was driven by divergent results in painful diabetic neuropathy (SMD −0.76, 95 % CI −1.16 to −0.36; raw NRS difference 1.3 points; P < 0.001) and mixed neuropathic pain (SMD −0.06, 95 % CI −0.57 to 0.45; P = 0.8). Sleep favoured melatonin in painful diabetic neuropathy (sleep-interference SMD −0.81, 95 % CI −1.21 to −0.41) and in multiple-sclerosis-related neuropathic pain (PSQI ↓ 55.9 %, P < 0.001). The ≥ 50 % responder rate in painful diabetic neuropathy was higher with melatonin (RR 1.47, 95 % CI 1.01 to 2.14). Risk of bias was low for six trials, raised some concerns for three trials and was high for one open-label trial. Adverse events were infrequent and did not differ from placebo. Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that melatonin reduces pain and improves sleep in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy with concomitant sleep disturbance and may benefit selected post-surgical neurosensory deficits and multiple-sclerosis-related neuropathic pain, but is unlikely to benefit unselected mixed neuropathic pain in tertiary chronic-pain settings. Substantial clinical heterogeneity and the small number of pooled trials preclude routine recommendation. Adequately powered, etiology-stratified trials with harmonised pain and sleep endpoints are required.