Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Nasya Nadhira Rahma
Universitas Pelita Harapan
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Transformasi Tata Kelola Investasi Daerah: Studi Kasus Perizinan Berbasis Risiko dan Percepatan Kawasan Industri Terpadu Batang (KITB) di Jawa Tengah Keisha Nadine Sastraatmaja; Laela Kuwayyis Wijaya; Nasya Nadhira Rahma; Tyazza Amaranila Ghifari
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11889

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 Job Creation has fundamentally transformed Indonesia’s business licensing system through the implementation of a risk-based business licensing regime, as regulated under Government Regulation Number 5 of 2021. This regulatory shift requires regional governments to realign local regulations and administrative practices to ensure legal certainty, procedural consistency, and effective investment facilitation. Central Java represents a relevant case as a non-mining province that relies heavily on manufacturing industries such as textiles, footwear, automotive, furniture, and electronics as the backbone of regional investment and employment creation. In 2023, Central Java recorded investment realization of IDR 77.02 trillion, exceeding its target and demonstrating strong competitiveness among regions. This study examines the role of Central Java Provincial Regulation Number 12 of 2022 on investment as a legal instrument supporting the transformation of regional investment governance in the post-Job Creation Law era. Using normative legal research with a statute and conceptual approach, this study analyses the harmonization of regional regulations with national investment policies and evaluates their implementation through a case study of the Integrated Industrial Estate of Batang (KITB). The findings indicate that Provincial Regulations No. 12 of 2022 provides a normative foundation for investment facilitation, risk-based licensing, and integrated one-stop services, which contribute to accelerating industrial development in KITB. The study concludes that the integration of regional legal frameworks, risk-based licensing mechanisms, and institutional readiness is essential to maintaining regional investment competitiveness and supporting sustainable industrial growth.
Kedudukan Alat Bukti dan Dinamika Beban Pembuktian pada Sengketa Pembayaran Kontrak Pemerintah: Studi Putusan Nomor 7/Pdt.G/2022/PN Tli Laela Kuwayyis Wijaya; Nasya Nadhira Rahma; Thenezia Tania Tirajoh; Tyazza Amaranila Ghifari
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the position of evidence and the dynamics of the burden of proof in disputes over government contract payments, with a focus on their implications for legal protection of business actors and the effectiveness of state budget implementation. The method used is a case study of District Court Decision No. 7/Pdt.G/2022/PN Tolitoli, involving a lawsuit filed by a private company against the local government for default in paying the remaining budget of a public market construction project in the 2018 fiscal year. The analysis is conducted normatively by examining contract documents, amendments, proof of work completion, and correspondence between the parties, as well as the evidentiary dynamics between the plaintiff and the defendant, including public officials and central government agencies. The findings reveal that the court acknowledged the validity of the contract and its amendments as primary evidence, declared the defendant in default for failing to fulfill payment obligations despite the completion of the project, and partially granted the plaintiff’s claim while rejecting the defendant’s administrative objection. Written evidence dominated the evidentiary process, while the burden of proof shifted from the plaintiff to the defendant once the initial evidence was presented, underscoring the principle that a valid agreement binds the parties and cannot be avoided on bureaucratic grounds. In conclusion, this decision reinforces both substantive and formal evidentiary practices in civil cases, promotes transparency and accountability in government contracts, protects business actors from the risks of default, and enhances legal certainty in state budget management to support a fairer and more professional bureaucratic reform.
Co-Authors Keisha Nadine Sastraatmaja Laela Kuwayyis Wijaya Thenezia Tania Tirajoh Tyazza Amaranila Ghifari